5.6 sec in total
962 ms
4.2 sec
442 ms
Click here to check amazing Preciousmetalswarrants content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about preciousmetalswarrants.com
Exclusive Database
Visit preciousmetalswarrants.comWe analyzed Preciousmetalswarrants.com page load time and found that the first response time was 962 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
preciousmetalswarrants.com performance score
962 ms
71 ms
69 ms
67 ms
106 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Preciousmetalswarrants.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (962 ms) relates to the external source Commonstockwarrants.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (41%)
3.7 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Preciousmetalswarrants.com main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 143.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Preciousmetalswarrants images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 961.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 961.1 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 384.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Preciousmetalswarrants.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 384.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (65%)
62
22
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Preciousmetalswarrants. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
commonstockwarrants.com
962 ms
css
71 ms
css
69 ms
css
67 ms
simple-payments.css
106 ms
style.min.css
172 ms
style-mobile.min.css
243 ms
style-weaverii.css
250 ms
front-legacy.css
263 ms
sow-social-media-buttons-atom-304a0dc14d90.css
253 ms
sow-image-default-eef982a7180b.css
253 ms
image-grid.css
253 ms
sow-image-grid-default-8392b8051d0b.css
317 ms
sow-price-table-atom-62cd5c181e65.css
319 ms
html-player-responsive.css
334 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
344 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
337 ms
templates.css
338 ms
css
60 ms
jetpack.css
403 ms
jquery.js
416 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
428 ms
pricetable.min.js
431 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
430 ms
so-video-widget.min.js
436 ms
mootools-weaver-combined.min.js
502 ms
site.js
94 ms
adsbygoogle.js
53 ms
colorbox.css
496 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
56 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
543 ms
image-grid.min.js
543 ms
weaverjslib.min.js
543 ms
wp-embed.min.js
544 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
586 ms
detect-mobile.js
586 ms
e-201736.js
53 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
524 ms
https:/
25 ms
ff1.png
111 ms
blackcsw2-01.png
177 ms
twitter-2.png
111 ms
rss-yellow.png
111 ms
facebook.png
146 ms
Subloginbutton-e1370974472703.jpg
146 ms
OrderServicebutton-e1370974699172.jpg
145 ms
bg-black.png
197 ms
new-1.png
273 ms
fried.jpg
225 ms
41tpp3sjJL._SX398_BO1204203200_-e1492811395965-197x300.jpg
231 ms
silversubscriberscreenshot-e1487517135172.png
444 ms
goldsubsciberscreenshot-e1487517718376.png
474 ms
displays.htm
109 ms
jquery.min.js
61 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
85 ms
ca-pub-6827532945847796.js
62 ms
zrt_lookup.html
82 ms
show_ads_impl.js
96 ms
wiaw-01.png
191 ms
overlay.png
213 ms
styles.css
15 ms
settings_v2
143 ms
g.gif
23 ms
ads
254 ms
osd.js
4 ms
preciousmetalswarrants.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Preciousmetalswarrants.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Preciousmetalswarrants.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
preciousmetalswarrants.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Preciousmetalswarrants. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: