20 sec in total
1.3 sec
17.9 sec
691 ms
Click here to check amazing Premium Graphite content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about premiumgraphite.com
We are one of the graphite production company in providing high quality graphite sheets, electrodes, blocks, crucibles, insulation board, etc at best price.
Visit premiumgraphite.comWe analyzed Premiumgraphite.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 18.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
premiumgraphite.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.1 s
0/100
10%
Value12.4 s
0/100
25%
Value11.3 s
5/100
10%
Value560 ms
53/100
30%
Value0.065
97/100
15%
Value20.1 s
2/100
10%
1321 ms
542 ms
1063 ms
1036 ms
1076 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Premiumgraphite.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Webchat.getalice.ai. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (11.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Premiumgraphite.com.
Page size can be reduced by 260.5 kB (6%)
4.2 MB
3.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Premiumgraphite.com main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 78.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 171.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Premium Graphite images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 466 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 9.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Premiumgraphite.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (76%)
67
16
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Premium Graphite. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.premiumgraphite.com
1321 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
542 ms
style.min.css
1063 ms
rs6.css
1036 ms
styles.css
1076 ms
form-themes.min.css
1109 ms
components.css
1171 ms
style.css
2596 ms
aad8b67aa408772ca4db718b8c2f8ddc.css
1565 ms
js_composer.min.css
1632 ms
formreset.min.css
1620 ms
formsmain.min.css
4020 ms
readyclass.min.css
1756 ms
browsers.min.css
2115 ms
jquery.min.js
2169 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
2173 ms
rbtools.min.js
2344 ms
rs6.min.js
3175 ms
jquery.json.min.js
2703 ms
gravityforms.min.js
2724 ms
jquery.maskedinput.min.js
2945 ms
cardprocess.js
3172 ms
js_composer_tta.min.css
3247 ms
font-awesome.min.css
3278 ms
owl.min.css
3543 ms
animate.min.css
3746 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
3636 ms
hooks.min.js
3791 ms
i18n.min.js
3843 ms
lodash.min.js
4147 ms
url.min.js
4110 ms
api-fetch.min.js
4291 ms
index.js
4365 ms
components.js
4971 ms
theme.js
4530 ms
wp-embed.min.js
4631 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
4726 ms
shortcodes-3rd.js
4331 ms
shortcodes.js
3828 ms
vc-accordion.min.js
4033 ms
vc-tta-autoplay.min.js
4116 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
4194 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
4212 ms
underscore.min.js
3956 ms
waypoints.min.js
3912 ms
vc_grid.min.js
4007 ms
Final_Logo.png
1638 ms
arrow.svg
1839 ms
slide-4-1.jpg
5865 ms
slide-3-1.jpg
11295 ms
slide-2-1.jpg
3679 ms
business-philosphy.jpeg
4397 ms
design-capability.jpg
8333 ms
pexels-photo-1093913.jpeg
2393 ms
Yellow-Black-Fashion-Photo-Collage-Copy.png
8250 ms
EQIC-LOGO-new.png
4228 ms
ppap.png
4782 ms
pioneer.png
4950 ms
logo_larsen_toubro.jpg
6165 ms
bg-noise.png
6106 ms
caret.png
6324 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
6587 ms
Simple-Line-Icons.ttf
7187 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
26 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
27 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
67 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
67 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
27 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
26 ms
bg-noise.png
6951 ms
index.js
79 ms
load.sumo.com
41 ms
wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js
6891 ms
wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js
7274 ms
wp-polyfill-url.min.js
7418 ms
wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js
7526 ms
wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js
7814 ms
wp-polyfill-object-fit.min.js
7864 ms
premiumgraphite.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
premiumgraphite.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
premiumgraphite.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Premiumgraphite.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Premiumgraphite.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
premiumgraphite.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Premium Graphite. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: