3 sec in total
150 ms
2.6 sec
232 ms
Welcome to prettywatermark.in homepage info - get ready to check Pretty Watermark best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about prettywatermark.in
PrettyWatermark: Get Latest Lifestyle News, Whats Hot On Social Media, Trending News, Product Reviews Only at PrettyWatermark.in
Visit prettywatermark.inWe analyzed Prettywatermark.in page load time and found that the first response time was 150 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
prettywatermark.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
22/100
10%
Value6.3 s
10/100
25%
Value5.6 s
53/100
10%
Value370 ms
71/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value9.0 s
33/100
10%
150 ms
402 ms
63 ms
99 ms
119 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Prettywatermark.in, 19% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 12% (8 requests) were made to C0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Prettywatermark.in.
Page size can be reduced by 153.0 kB (24%)
629.5 kB
476.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Prettywatermark.in main page is 629.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 233.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 58.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.3 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pretty Watermark images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 13.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 72.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Prettywatermark.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 72.6 kB or 31% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (64%)
47
17
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pretty Watermark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
prettywatermark.in
150 ms
prettywatermark.in
402 ms
analytics.js
63 ms
js
99 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
119 ms
style.min.css
106 ms
style.min.css
118 ms
style.min.css
112 ms
style.min.css
123 ms
style.min.css
122 ms
blocks.style.build.css
186 ms
styles.css
258 ms
email-subscribers-public.css
259 ms
embedpress.css
257 ms
mu-style.css
259 ms
css
130 ms
widget.css
259 ms
style.css
260 ms
style.css
328 ms
style.css
1250 ms
jetpack.css
121 ms
frontend.min.js
326 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
330 ms
jquery.min.js
123 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
124 ms
email-subscribers-public.js
331 ms
pdfobject.min.js
330 ms
sharethis.js
124 ms
scripts.js
398 ms
front.js
397 ms
register-sw.js
399 ms
tagdiv_theme.min.js
610 ms
OneSignalSDK.js
125 ms
e-202239.js
122 ms
collect
28 ms
101030204_382347406045363_1407453694264516742_n.jpg
399 ms
100892082_2764306687028838_6805309994948335777_n.jpg
403 ms
100901030_935698923541847_915155463382748098_n.jpg
476 ms
td_218x150.png
163 ms
Screenshot_20211201-172027_Chrome-218x150.jpg
100 ms
MP000000010881965_437Wx649H_202110100657391-218x150.jpeg
100 ms
517e9guwRxL._SX522_-1-218x150.jpg
101 ms
20211016_150512-218x150.jpg
292 ms
NEUD-Carrot-Seed-Premium-Hair-SDL433272753-2-a7007-218x150.jpg
101 ms
photo-218x150.jpg
160 ms
byjus-logo-E37962D240-seeklogo.com_-218x150.png
160 ms
fab-218x150.png
236 ms
IMG-20210319-WA0024-218x150.jpg
160 ms
spinner.gif
289 ms
zomato.png
466 ms
tripadvisor.png
289 ms
ico-video-large.png
289 ms
100533134_143676063894941_926994230114781729_n.jpg
481 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
117 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
117 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
141 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
139 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
140 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
138 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
137 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
136 ms
newspaper.woff
257 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf
140 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexQ.ttf
144 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexQ.ttf
140 ms
socicon.woff
503 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf
142 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf
142 ms
prettywatermark.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
prettywatermark.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
prettywatermark.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Prettywatermark.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Prettywatermark.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
prettywatermark.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pretty Watermark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: