Tools & Wizards About Us
privacymark.jp screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 48% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    43% of websites

privacymark.jp

プライバシーマーク制度｜一般財団法人日本情報経済社会推進協会（JIPDEC）

Page Load Speed

5.4 sec in total

First Response

982 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

privacymark.jp screenshot

About Website

Welcome to privacymark.jp homepage info - get ready to check Privacymark best content for Japan right away, or after learning these important things about privacymark.jp

プライバシーマーク制度｜プライバシーマーク制度は、事業者の個人情報の取扱いが適切であるかを評価し、基準に適合した事業者に”プライバシーマーク”の使用を認める制度です。

Visit privacymark.jp

Key Findings

We analyzed Privacymark.jp page load time and found that the first response time was 982 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

privacymark.jp performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.3 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value530 ms

55/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.981

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.2 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

privacymark.jp

982 ms

import_home.css

293 ms

setdate.js

356 ms

default.css

292 ms

home.css

596 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Privacymark.jp and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Privacymark.jp.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 56.0 kB (25%)

Content Size

223.2 kB

After Optimization

167.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Privacymark.jp main page is 223.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 182.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 16.2 kB

  • Original 21.9 kB
  • After minification 20.9 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.2 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 24.4 kB

  • Original 182.5 kB
  • After minification 158.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Privacymark needs image optimization as it can save up to 24.4 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 196 B

  • Original 420 B
  • After minification 359 B
  • After compression 224 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 196 B or 47% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 15.2 kB

  • Original 18.3 kB
  • After minification 10.4 kB
  • After compression 3.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Privacymark.jp needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (37%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

24

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Privacymark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

privacymark.jp

privacymark.jp

982 ms

import_home.css

import_home.css

293 ms

setdate.js

setdate.js

356 ms

default.css

default.css

292 ms

home.css

home.css

596 ms

header_border.gif

header_border.gif

179 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

180 ms

Eng_btn.gif

Eng_btn.gif

146 ms

sitemap.gif

sitemap.gif

156 ms

faq.gif

faq.gif

291 ms

toiawase.gif

toiawase.gif

310 ms

new01.gif

new01.gif

535 ms

topbn_seminar.png

topbn_seminar.png

713 ms

topbn_pms.png

topbn_pms.png

891 ms

topbn_koushi.png

topbn_koushi.png

1179 ms

topbn_newappl.png

topbn_newappl.png

732 ms

jipdec_forum_2015_banner.gif

jipdec_forum_2015_banner.gif

619 ms

topbn_member.gif

topbn_member.gif

712 ms

jipdec_forum_2016_banner.jpg

jipdec_forum_2016_banner.jpg

928 ms

ban01-1_1.gif

ban01-1_1.gif

891 ms

pamphlet_top.jpg

pamphlet_top.jpg

1244 ms

jipdec_logo1.gif

jipdec_logo1.gif

873 ms

header_bg.jpg

header_bg.jpg

1154 ms

bullet_external.gif

bullet_external.gif

1032 ms

bullet_navi.gif

bullet_navi.gif

1038 ms

barbg_news.jpg

barbg_news.jpg

1046 ms

info_02.png

info_02.png

1209 ms

news_bg.gif

news_bg.gif

1216 ms

bullet_news.gif

bullet_news.gif

1204 ms

bullet_navi_white.gif

bullet_navi_white.gif

1278 ms

barbg_navi1.jpg

barbg_navi1.jpg

1338 ms

barbg_navi3.jpg

barbg_navi3.jpg

1358 ms

barbg_google.jpg

barbg_google.jpg

1387 ms

barbg_navi2.jpg

barbg_navi2.jpg

1387 ms

barbg_prt.jpg

barbg_prt.jpg

1392 ms

barbg_navi4.jpg

barbg_navi4.jpg

1422 ms

footer_line.gif

footer_line.gif

1535 ms

bullet_top.gif

bullet_top.gif

1511 ms

print_home.css

print_home.css

189 ms

Accessibility Review

privacymark.jp accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

privacymark.jp best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

privacymark.jp SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Privacymark.jp can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Privacymark.jp main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

privacymark.jp

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Privacymark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: