7.4 sec in total
2.3 sec
4.7 sec
375 ms
Click here to check amazing Processamentodigital content for Brazil. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about processamentodigital.com.br
Geotecnologias e Software Livre
Visit processamentodigital.com.brWe analyzed Processamentodigital.com.br page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
processamentodigital.com.br performance score
2277 ms
125 ms
88 ms
92 ms
72 ms
Our browser made a total of 129 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Processamentodigital.com.br, 9% (12 requests) were made to Facebook.com and 9% (12 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Processamentodigital.com.br.
Page size can be reduced by 662.4 kB (28%)
2.4 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Processamentodigital.com.br main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 143.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 143.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 221.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Processamentodigital needs image optimization as it can save up to 221.5 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 264.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 264.4 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 33.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Processamentodigital.com.br needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 33.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (44%)
126
71
The browser has sent 126 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Processamentodigital. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.processamentodigital.com.br
2277 ms
style.css
125 ms
default.css
88 ms
custom.css
92 ms
shortcodes.css
72 ms
styles.css
101 ms
jquery.min.js
212 ms
shortcodes.js
101 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.5.custom.min.js
303 ms
superfish.js
125 ms
slides.min.jquery.js
127 ms
custom.js
137 ms
html5.js
167 ms
plusone.js
58 ms
tw-sack.min.js
169 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
128 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
31 ms
bg-body.png
46 ms
ico-header-rss.png
49 ms
ico-header-email.png
46 ms
ico-header-facebook.png
45 ms
ico-header-twitter.png
53 ms
bg-header.png
213 ms
pd_logo_.png
88 ms
alert-overlay.png
89 ms
ico-search.png
90 ms
bg-secondary-nav.png
88 ms
QGIS212_Relacao_de_Valor.png
256 ms
QGIS_OpenLayers.png
124 ms
all.js
166 ms
QGIS_R_Reclass.png
185 ms
ArcGIS_Calc_Perc_Area.png
137 ms
QGIS_Gerar_NDVI1.png
126 ms
ArcGIS_Recorte_de_TIN.png
167 ms
QGIS_Gerar_NDVI.png
213 ms
QGis_Tratamento_MDE.png
157 ms
QGIS_Delimitacao_SAGAGIS.png
163 ms
QGis_Topologia.png
152 ms
ArcGIS_CoordenadasXY.png
115 ms
30 ms
QGIS_Revisao_Taudem.png
132 ms
xd_arbiter.php
137 ms
xd_arbiter.php
263 ms
QGIS_Composicao_PNC.png
128 ms
ArcGIS_Coordenadas.png
91 ms
ArcGIS_Composicao_PNC.png
82 ms
ArcGIS_Georreferenciamento.png
120 ms
QGis_Desinstalacao.png
101 ms
ArcGIS_Cuidados_ArcHydro.png
109 ms
ArcGIS_Tratamento_MDE.png
52 ms
ArcGIS_Segmentacao.png
90 ms
QGIS212_Relacao_de_Valor-290x150.png
49 ms
ico-comment.png
63 ms
QGIS_OpenLayers-290x150.png
39 ms
QGIS_R_Reclass-290x150.png
52 ms
ArcGIS_Calc_Perc_Area-290x150.png
46 ms
QGIS_Gerar_NDVI1-290x150.png
49 ms
ArcGIS_Recorte_de_TIN-290x150.png
47 ms
QGIS_Gerar_NDVI-290x150.png
46 ms
QGis_Tratamento_MDE-290x150.png
47 ms
QGIS_Delimitacao_SAGAGIS-290x150.png
47 ms
QGis_Topologia-290x150.png
46 ms
LogoSRGeo.jpg
164 ms
tracker.js
42 ms
widgets.js
83 ms
all.js
80 ms
jquery.form.min.js
52 ms
scripts.js
59 ms
ico-footer-twitter.png
121 ms
ico-footer-facebook.png
117 ms
ico-footer-google.png
118 ms
ico-footer-rss.png
119 ms
ico-footer-email.png
120 ms
tracker.php
122 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
52 ms
analytics.js
203 ms
arrow-down.png
81 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
293 ms
ico-pagination-prev.png
89 ms
ico-pagination-next.png
60 ms
xd_arbiter.php
113 ms
xd_arbiter.php
111 ms
fastbutton
87 ms
postmessageRelay
206 ms
collect
46 ms
like.php
52 ms
like.php
66 ms
like.php
179 ms
like.php
179 ms
like.php
214 ms
like.php
226 ms
like.php
224 ms
like.php
251 ms
like_box.php
298 ms
like.php
248 ms
like.php
249 ms
rs=AGLTcCMZQMkD3nQb9neyXrDGlfp1IpCqrw
57 ms
collect
261 ms
jJhqmvSAXq3.js
462 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
430 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
171 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
306 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
243 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
228 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
243 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
120 ms
kyEKgjk51ZE.css
188 ms
xgj7bXhJNEH.css
191 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
228 ms
VvsfEObxnnn.js
269 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
219 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
250 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
19 ms
375836_357725544303926_529730627_n.jpg
212 ms
301745_286970158046132_2106407112_n.jpg
282 ms
1175029_243519392464340_452352919_n.jpg
370 ms
12321587_1274644779216251_8963817748822055361_n.jpg
326 ms
12036678_863557673733823_2105442871067495450_n.jpg
326 ms
12241282_1066478386717686_7833988328570045382_n.jpg
360 ms
12688340_978384292241067_5973142145247491886_n.jpg
362 ms
12717677_1051984764859817_8653407429199851739_n.jpg
331 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
45 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
44 ms
jot.html
27 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
41 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
80 ms
QGIS212_Relacao_de_Valor.png
191 ms
loader-white.gif
46 ms
ico-slider-pagination.png
50 ms
processamentodigital.com.br SEO score
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Processamentodigital.com.br can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Processamentodigital.com.br main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
processamentodigital.com.br
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Processamentodigital. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: