3.1 sec in total
395 ms
2.6 sec
107 ms
Welcome to processpark.com homepage info - get ready to check Process Park best content right away, or after learning these important things about processpark.com
This is the official Web Site of ProcessPark. We are experts at ITIL® COBIT ISO20000 trainings, project management and consultancy.
Visit processpark.comWe analyzed Processpark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 395 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
processpark.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value9.6 s
0/100
25%
Value7.6 s
25/100
10%
Value1,250 ms
19/100
30%
Value0.083
94/100
15%
Value10.5 s
24/100
10%
395 ms
201 ms
204 ms
409 ms
305 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (89 requests) were addressed to the original Processpark.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Processpark.com.
Page size can be reduced by 643.1 kB (41%)
1.6 MB
909.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Processpark.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 779.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Process Park images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 461.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 461.6 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 146.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Processpark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 146.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (26%)
92
68
The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Process Park. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
processpark.com
395 ms
skeleton.css
201 ms
base.css
204 ms
layout.css
409 ms
prettyPhoto.css
305 ms
shortcodes.css
306 ms
fontello.css
353 ms
responsive.css
302 ms
retina.css
306 ms
style.css
404 ms
jquery-1.5.1.min.js
508 ms
jquery.simplemodal.1.4.1.min.js
406 ms
jquery.easing.js
407 ms
portfolio.js
470 ms
fitvids.js
505 ms
jquery.tweet.js
507 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.1.0-packed.js
517 ms
plugins.js
517 ms
tooltips.js
587 ms
shortcodes.js
606 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
609 ms
custom.js
610 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
610 ms
adsbygoogle.js
66 ms
basic.css
1010 ms
ga.js
443 ms
main_bg.png
103 ms
logo.png
106 ms
s5.jpg
308 ms
s4.jpg
205 ms
s_1.jpg
204 ms
s_2.jpg
353 ms
s_3.jpg
305 ms
dn_image.png
207 ms
egt.png
306 ms
coz.png
307 ms
cobit.jpg
309 ms
itil.jpg
407 ms
apmg_logo.jpg
408 ms
pecb_logo.jpg
409 ms
47_1.jpg
410 ms
28_1.jpg
411 ms
1_1.jpg
471 ms
2_1.jpg
508 ms
3_1.jpg
509 ms
29_1.jpg
510 ms
4_1.jpg
511 ms
30_1.jpg
513 ms
31_1.jpg
588 ms
32_1.jpg
610 ms
5_1.jpg
610 ms
6_1.jpg
611 ms
7_1.jpg
612 ms
8_1.jpg
614 ms
9_1.jpg
705 ms
10_1.jpg
711 ms
33_1.jpg
712 ms
11_1.jpg
713 ms
12_1.jpg
713 ms
13_1.jpg
716 ms
14_1.jpg
821 ms
show_ads_impl.js
75 ms
zrt_lookup.html
25 ms
fontelloea92.woff
874 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
collect
30 ms
15_1.jpg
715 ms
ga-audiences
80 ms
16_1.jpg
713 ms
ads
94 ms
17_1.jpg
615 ms
18_1.jpg
617 ms
34_1.jpg
715 ms
46_1.jpg
617 ms
35_1.jpg
620 ms
19_1.jpg
620 ms
20_1.jpg
636 ms
36_1.jpg
710 ms
37_1.jpg
667 ms
38_1.jpg
614 ms
21_1.jpg
615 ms
22_1.jpg
617 ms
index.cgi
362 ms
39_1.jpg
651 ms
40_1.jpg
709 ms
41_1.jpg
651 ms
42_1.jpg
614 ms
43_1.jpg
616 ms
24_1.jpg
617 ms
44_1.jpg
668 ms
23_1.jpg
709 ms
25_1.jpg
634 ms
26_1.jpg
615 ms
27_1.jpg
616 ms
45_1.jpg
618 ms
button_bg.png
684 ms
arrows.png
708 ms
processpark.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
processpark.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
processpark.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Processpark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Processpark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
processpark.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Process Park. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: