6.1 sec in total
386 ms
5.1 sec
609 ms
Welcome to proefschrift.nl homepage info - get ready to check Proefschrift best content right away, or after learning these important things about proefschrift.nl
Visit proefschrift.nlWe analyzed Proefschrift.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 386 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
proefschrift.nl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
42/100
10%
Value16.3 s
0/100
25%
Value10.0 s
9/100
10%
Value320 ms
77/100
30%
Value1.334
0/100
15%
Value12.8 s
13/100
10%
386 ms
2321 ms
124 ms
286 ms
287 ms
Our browser made a total of 114 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Proefschrift.nl, 26% (30 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Proefschrift.nl.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (33%)
3.7 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Proefschrift.nl main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 210.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 210.1 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 71.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Proefschrift images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 427.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 427.1 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 510.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Proefschrift.nl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 510.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (38%)
79
49
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Proefschrift. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
proefschrift.nl
386 ms
proefschrift.nl
2321 ms
api.js
124 ms
styles.css
286 ms
front.min.css
287 ms
espresso_default.css
393 ms
style.min.css
776 ms
style.css
290 ms
jquery.min.js
478 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
303 ms
front.min.js
377 ms
ai.min.js
484 ms
js
57 ms
et-core-unified-2609.min.css
410 ms
shortcodes-legacy.css
228 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
213 ms
jquery.adrotate.dyngroup.js
245 ms
clicker.js
312 ms
index.js
315 ms
index.js
317 ms
jquery.pajinate.min.js
335 ms
pagination.js
350 ms
masonry.min.js
439 ms
salvattore.js
440 ms
scripts.min.js
781 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
441 ms
magnific-popup.js
452 ms
common.js
523 ms
et_shortcodes_frontend.js
521 ms
forms.js
524 ms
style.css
521 ms
background-wine-leaf-1.png
126 ms
PS.nl-logo.png
127 ms
tartaar-fles-440x264.jpg
127 ms
Solutre-Pouilly_27082018_4860-kopie-3-440x264.jpg
125 ms
Jorge-Monzon-440x264.jpg
127 ms
View-Podere-Forte-5-kopie-440x264.jpg
216 ms
x-20240419VoorjaarsproeverijAndreKerstens-287-kopie-440x264.jpeg
215 ms
Paxxx-vier-heemskinderen-kopie-440x264.jpg
268 ms
tartaar-fles-1080x768.jpg
306 ms
View-Podere-Forte-5-kopie.jpg
309 ms
Solutre-Pouilly_27082018_4860-kopie-3.jpg
350 ms
Jorge-Monzon-1080x768.jpg
582 ms
Lisja-Hu-kopie-1080x768.jpg
595 ms
x-20240419VoorjaarsproeverijAndreKerstens-287-kopie.jpeg
606 ms
caillerets-1-495x376.jpeg
411 ms
wit-puur-150x150.jpg
420 ms
Walporzheim-grosse-lagen-150x150.jpg
457 ms
1-150x150.jpg
518 ms
Chassagne-Montrachet_01072015_8804-kopie-150x150.jpg
530 ms
Langoustine--627x376.jpg
565 ms
zeetong-B-150x150.jpg
623 ms
Zeekat-dauwbraam-150x150.jpg
638 ms
Rode-mul-2-150x150.jpg
670 ms
Librije_interieur2-700-150x150.jpg
686 ms
kleuren-rose-2-kopie-627x376.jpg
703 ms
xx-28a95811-73b1-45a4-ad0e-39cfe38fce1c-kopie-150x150.jpg
715 ms
proeverij-sfeer-1-kopie-150x150.jpg
729 ms
Paxxx-vier-heemskinderen-kopie-627x376.jpg
740 ms
Murrieta-1-150x150.jpg
774 ms
proeverij-zuiver-wijnen-150x150.jpg
790 ms
BANNER-WP-2025-510x288-1.jpg
805 ms
Trophee-Henriot.png
819 ms
Persbericht-Verbunt-Verlinden-kopie-150x150.jpg
832 ms
WineParisVinexpoParis23_PhilippeLabeguerie-PL5_2528-150x150.jpg
845 ms
KVNW-Wijninfo-website-1692x952-kopie-150x150.jpg
774 ms
js
97 ms
analytics.js
35 ms
ET-Extra.woff
776 ms
Gert-Crum-1-150x150.jpg
800 ms
tartaar-fles-627x376.jpg
801 ms
View-Podere-Forte-5-kopie-150x150.jpg
815 ms
et-extra-dynamic-2609-late.css
808 ms
Solutre-Pouilly_27082018_4860-kopie-3-150x150.jpg
947 ms
collect
56 ms
Jorge-Monzon-150x150.jpg
886 ms
Lisja-Hu-kopie-150x150.jpg
836 ms
caillerets-1-150x150.jpeg
902 ms
View-Podere-Forte-5-kopie-627x376.jpg
865 ms
x-20240419VoorjaarsproeverijAndreKerstens-287-kopie-150x150.jpeg
862 ms
Paxxx-vier-heemskinderen-kopie-150x150.jpg
820 ms
BANNER-WP-2025-300x425-1.jpg
919 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff
158 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
317 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff
319 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
322 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVQ.woff
322 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf
323 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4uaVQ.woff
323 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4uaVc.ttf
319 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff
320 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
383 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff
383 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
385 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWA.woff
299 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf
298 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHw.woff
297 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf
299 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-s.woff
299 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf
301 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw.woff
299 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf
300 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHw.woff
299 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf
301 ms
u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52xwNZVsf8.woff
301 ms
u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52xwNZVsf_.ttf
301 ms
u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52_wFZVsf8.woff
303 ms
u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52_wFZVsf_.ttf
305 ms
u-440qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-ciZK.woff
303 ms
u-440qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-ciZJ.ttf
302 ms
u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l521wRZVsf8.woff
303 ms
u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l521wRZVsf_.ttf
377 ms
modules.woff
215 ms
style.min.css
109 ms
proefschrift.nl accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
proefschrift.nl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
proefschrift.nl SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
NL
NL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Proefschrift.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Proefschrift.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
proefschrift.nl
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Proefschrift. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: