4.2 sec in total
848 ms
3.1 sec
338 ms
Visit profilepress.net now to see the best up-to-date Profile Press content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about profilepress.net
Monetize your site with our WordPress membership plugin, sell subscriptions & digital downloads, set up paid registration & restrict content.
Visit profilepress.netWe analyzed Profilepress.net page load time and found that the first response time was 848 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
profilepress.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value4.4 s
39/100
25%
Value3.8 s
84/100
10%
Value3,860 ms
1/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.0 s
42/100
10%
848 ms
36 ms
65 ms
59 ms
67 ms
Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Profilepress.net, 69% (72 requests) were made to D2hkd6cwxvu8h1.cloudfront.net and 10% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Profilepress.net.
Page size can be reduced by 257.6 kB (42%)
616.4 kB
358.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Profilepress.net main page is 616.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 297.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 75.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Profile Press images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 170.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 170.4 kB or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Profilepress.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (86%)
80
11
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Profile Press. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
profilepress.net
848 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
36 ms
crayon.min.css
65 ms
styles.css
59 ms
edd.min.css
67 ms
bs.css
59 ms
flat-ui.css
56 ms
zocial.css
61 ms
ppcore.min.css
117 ms
font-awesome.min.css
107 ms
chosen.min.css
102 ms
settings.css
103 ms
captions.php
901 ms
wpmenucart-icons.css
99 ms
wpmenucart-main.css
99 ms
style.css
119 ms
media-queries.css
118 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
114 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css
159 ms
css
101 ms
fontello.css
145 ms
jetpack.css
159 ms
jquery.js
157 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
167 ms
crayon.min.js
169 ms
edd-ajax.min.js
163 ms
zxcvbn-async.min.js
165 ms
bootstrap-filestyle.js
164 ms
jcarousel.js
165 ms
sweetalert2.min.js
166 ms
pp-del-avatar.js
168 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
180 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
167 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
178 ms
api.js
179 ms
api.js
141 ms
wpmenucart.js
121 ms
jquery.form.min.js
126 ms
scripts.js
127 ms
zxcvbn.min.js
152 ms
core.min.js
127 ms
datepicker.min.js
128 ms
password-strength-meter.min.js
84 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
116 ms
ddsmoothmenu.js
127 ms
selectnav.js
126 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
131 ms
jquery.easytabs.js
146 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
130 ms
jquery.sharrre-1.3.3.php
1106 ms
e-201609.js
83 ms
webfont.js
100 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
110 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js
122 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
124 ms
jquery.touchcarousel-1.2.min.js
122 ms
twitter.min.js
130 ms
boostrapslider.js
108 ms
scripts.js
122 ms
scripts_menu_multi.js
144 ms
comment-reply.min.js
72 ms
wp-embed.min.js
86 ms
analytics.js
148 ms
fbds.js
94 ms
heap-1449029382.js
83 ms
logo.png
82 ms
transparent.png
72 ms
login-form-code.png
74 ms
profilepress-templates-shpwcase.png
76 ms
sitepoint.png
72 ms
wpmayor2.png
72 ms
wplift.png
74 ms
recaptcha__en.js
196 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
128 ms
lato-regular.woff
123 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
130 ms
lato-light.woff
126 ms
zJY4gsxBiSo5L7tNutxFNg.ttf
128 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
127 ms
lato-bold.woff
119 ms
4cKlrioa77J2iqTqBgkRWg.ttf
128 ms
lato-black.woff
118 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
122 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
119 ms
VNUH7ZAcagYBWsAiBBCEY6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
124 ms
HkF_qI1x_noxlxhrhMQYEKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
122 ms
lato-bolditalic.woff
111 ms
LqowQDslGv4DmUBAfWa2Vw.ttf
117 ms
lato-italic.woff
114 ms
2HG_tEPiQ4Z6795cGfdivKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
115 ms
gc5ZVKiLNkRdGlU3GaSVBfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
114 ms
fontello.woff
183 ms
linkid.js
158 ms
185 ms
fontello-social.woff
35 ms
collect
171 ms
collect
465 ms
g.gif
394 ms
jquery.min.js
402 ms
timer.png
212 ms
loader.gif
17 ms
dropdown-arrow.png
16 ms
h
83 ms
ga-audiences
77 ms
profilepress.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
profilepress.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
profilepress.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Profilepress.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Profilepress.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
profilepress.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Profile Press. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: