3.5 sec in total
1.1 sec
2 sec
310 ms
Welcome to projectarchive.net homepage info - get ready to check Project Archive best content right away, or after learning these important things about projectarchive.net
ProjectArchive is my playground on the web. A list of common tools and my personal blog.
Visit projectarchive.netWe analyzed Projectarchive.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
projectarchive.net performance score
1123 ms
168 ms
108 ms
302 ms
139 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Projectarchive.net, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Projectarchive.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (80%)
2.0 MB
393.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Projectarchive.net main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 759.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 483.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Project Archive needs image optimization as it can save up to 483.6 kB or 86% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 537.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 537.8 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 556.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Projectarchive.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 556.4 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (80%)
61
12
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Project Archive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
projectarchive.net
1123 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
168 ms
reset.css
108 ms
bootstrap.min.css
302 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
139 ms
font-awesome.min.css
168 ms
global.css
106 ms
animate.css
269 ms
style.css
143 ms
buttons.css
263 ms
css
26 ms
front.css
185 ms
display.css
190 ms
bootstrap.css
349 ms
font-awesome.css
250 ms
theme.css
299 ms
style.css
296 ms
sdr-front.css
298 ms
css
34 ms
wppa-style.css
302 ms
jquery.js
368 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
318 ms
jquery.form.min.js
324 ms
wppa-utils.min.js
327 ms
wppa.min.js
332 ms
wppa-slideshow.min.js
398 ms
wppa-ajax-front.min.js
393 ms
wppa-popup.min.js
393 ms
wppa-init.en.js
393 ms
bootstrap.min.js
394 ms
underscore.min.js
396 ms
ve_front.js
411 ms
jsrm-page-script.js
411 ms
default.js
412 ms
bootstrap.js
447 ms
ag_script.js
416 ms
ve-row.js
403 ms
wp-slimstat.min.js
96 ms
ve-text.js
373 ms
ve-image.js
352 ms
ve-button.js
348 ms
ve-slider.js
388 ms
comment-reply.min.js
373 ms
sdr-front.js
362 ms
ace.js
566 ms
ext-modelist.js
345 ms
ext-themelist.js
334 ms
wp-embed.min.js
330 ms
jcl.js
266 ms
jquery.cookie.js
259 ms
jquery.storage.js
276 ms
ve_popup.js
249 ms
analytics.js
48 ms
PA2.png
499 ms
footer-bg.png
71 ms
fulls.png
86 ms
loading.gif
87 ms
RalewayRegular.woff
81 ms
raleway-bold-webfont.woff
48 ms
Dosis-Regular-webfont.woff
104 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
125 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
145 ms
collect
18 ms
projectarchive.net SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Projectarchive.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Projectarchive.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
projectarchive.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Project Archive. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: