Tools & Wizards About Us
projectsangam.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

projectsangam.com

Community Training

Page Load Speed

7.3 sec in total

First Response

868 ms

Resources Loaded

5.9 sec

Page Rendered

535 ms

projectsangam.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Projectsangam content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about projectsangam.com

Enable learning for everyone, everywhere.

Visit projectsangam.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Projectsangam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 868 ms and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

projectsangam.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.0 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,290 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value34.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

communitytraining.microsoft.com

868 ms

mwf-main.min.css

863 ms

style.css

820 ms

mobile-nav.js

812 ms

mwf-auto-init-main.var.min.js

2777 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Projectsangam.com, 18% (5 requests) were made to C.s-microsoft.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Az416426.vo.msecnd.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.9 sec) relates to the external source Communitytraining.microsoft.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 115.7 kB (20%)

Content Size

568.7 kB

After Optimization

453.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Projectsangam.com main page is 568.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 275.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 22.5 kB

  • Original 28.2 kB
  • After minification 20.6 kB
  • After compression 5.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.7 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 8.7 kB

  • Original 275.7 kB
  • After minification 267.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Projectsangam images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 30.3 kB

  • Original 117.0 kB
  • After minification 117.0 kB
  • After compression 86.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 30.3 kB or 26% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 54.3 kB

  • Original 147.8 kB
  • After minification 147.8 kB
  • After compression 93.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Projectsangam.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 54.3 kB or 37% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Projectsangam. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

communitytraining.microsoft.com

communitytraining.microsoft.com

868 ms

mwf-main.min.css

mwf-main.min.css

863 ms

style.css

style.css

820 ms

mobile-nav.js

mobile-nav.js

812 ms

mwf-auto-init-main.var.min.js

mwf-auto-init-main.var.min.js

2777 ms

Banner.png

Banner.png

1691 ms

mobile-view.svg

mobile-view.svg

3854 ms

learning-easy.svg

learning-easy.svg

1688 ms

last-mile-screenshot.svg

last-mile-screenshot.svg

3668 ms

non-wifi.svg

non-wifi.svg

1915 ms

grassroot.svg

grassroot.svg

2678 ms

Vector.svg

Vector.svg

2091 ms

makeityourown.svg

makeityourown.svg

3334 ms

palette.svg

palette.svg

2287 ms

assessandmeasure.svg

assessandmeasure.svg

2296 ms

measure.svg

measure.svg

2491 ms

pdf-logo.png

pdf-logo.png

2501 ms

NigeriaPortal.svg

NigeriaPortal.svg

2708 ms

Gauteng.svg

Gauteng.svg

2711 ms

SwachhBharat.svg

SwachhBharat.svg

2885 ms

DigitalGreen.svg

DigitalGreen.svg

2900 ms

ai.2.min.js

ai.2.min.js

1651 ms

latest.woff

latest.woff

73 ms

latest.woff

latest.woff

87 ms

latest.woff

latest.woff

97 ms

latest.woff

latest.woff

97 ms

latest.woff

latest.woff

117 ms

mwfmdl2-v2.81.woff

mwfmdl2-v2.81.woff

63 ms

Accessibility Review

projectsangam.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

projectsangam.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

projectsangam.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Projectsangam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Projectsangam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

projectsangam.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Projectsangam. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: