1.1 sec in total
47 ms
908 ms
183 ms
Click here to check amazing Proofreading content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about proof-reading.com
Proof Reading, LLC full-time editors deliver consistent and professional proofreading on every document they read. They are 100% human (not robots or software), US-educated, professional proofreaders ...
Visit proof-reading.comWe analyzed Proof-reading.com page load time and found that the first response time was 47 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
proof-reading.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
85/100
10%
Value2.7 s
86/100
25%
Value4.9 s
66/100
10%
Value670 ms
44/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value11.8 s
17/100
10%
47 ms
229 ms
45 ms
42 ms
68 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Proof-reading.com, 13% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (440 ms) belongs to the original domain Proof-reading.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (72%)
2.1 MB
577.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Proof-reading.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Proofreading needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.0 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 154.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Proof-reading.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 154.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (54%)
50
23
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Proofreading. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
proof-reading.com
47 ms
www.proof-reading.com
229 ms
style.css
45 ms
nav-v.css
42 ms
jquery-wijmo.css
68 ms
jquery.wijmo-complete.all.2.3.4.min.css
86 ms
afm.asp
41 ms
top_bar.gif
41 ms
brand
39 ms
getseal
101 ms
asc
25 ms
conversion.js
24 ms
app.js
440 ms
brand
29 ms
proof-reading-78245.png
51 ms
proof-reading-78245.js
52 ms
seal
8 ms
13.gif
35 ms
back.gif
35 ms
logo.gif
34 ms
home_site_contact.gif
35 ms
Home_off.gif
34 ms
site_map_off.gif
34 ms
contact_off.gif
46 ms
back_off.png
43 ms
white_out_editing.jpg
60 ms
login_head.jpg
123 ms
login_back.jpg
43 ms
login_bar.jpg
134 ms
copy_back.gif
43 ms
rss.png
58 ms
facebook.png
58 ms
twitter.png
58 ms
google_custom_search_watermark.gif
31 ms
getseal
73 ms
plusone.js
102 ms
analytics.js
31 ms
81 ms
copywright.gif
22 ms
bar_bottom.gif
22 ms
collect
11 ms
41 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
13 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
23 ms
fastbutton
103 ms
postmessageRelay
45 ms
api.js
39 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
52 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
45 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
12 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
17 ms
tracking.js
94 ms
ui-bg_flat_100_f1f1f1_40x100.png
15 ms
ui-bg_highlight-soft_15_242122_1x100.png
11 ms
ui-icons_00a6dd_256x240.png
12 ms
proof-reading.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
proof-reading.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
proof-reading.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Proof-reading.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Proof-reading.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
proof-reading.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Proofreading. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: