Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

prootter.com

新加坡六合彩官方网站-新加坡六合彩开奖网-新加坡多多六合彩开奖结果

Page Load Speed

10.1 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

8.6 sec

Page Rendered

214 ms

prootter.com screenshot

About Website

Visit prootter.com now to see the best up-to-date Prootter content for Spain and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about prootter.com

新加坡六合彩官方网站⌛在鱼龙混杂的行业里独树一帜,主要提供六合彩资料,六合彩图库,六合彩开奖等,是行业内信誉最好、赔率最高的平台,美女小姐姐全天7*181小时在线服务,赶快参与进来吧!

Visit prootter.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Prootter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 8.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

prootter.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value19.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value630 ms

47/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.043

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

prootter.com

1300 ms

www.prootter.com

940 ms

html.js

395 ms

shariff.min.css

439 ms

jasny-bootstrap.min.css

443 ms

Our browser made a total of 138 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 41% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Prootter.com, 19% (26 requests) were made to Berlin-international.de and 14% (20 requests) were made to 0. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Prootter.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.0 MB (29%)

Content Size

10.4 MB

After Optimization

7.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Prootter.com main page is 10.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 10.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 120.5 kB

  • Original 136.7 kB
  • After minification 87.0 kB
  • After compression 16.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 49.7 kB, which is 36% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 120.5 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 2.9 MB

  • Original 10.2 MB
  • After minification 7.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Prootter needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.9 MB or 28% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 73.3 kB
  • After minification 73.3 kB
  • After compression 68.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 634 B

  • Original 2.9 kB
  • After minification 2.9 kB
  • After compression 2.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Prootter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 634 B or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (46%)

Requests Now

109

After Optimization

59

The browser has sent 109 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Prootter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

prootter.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

prootter.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

prootter.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    GBK

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Prootter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Prootter.com main page’s claimed encoding is gbk. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Prootter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: