2.8 sec in total
261 ms
1.9 sec
552 ms
Click here to check amazing Protec content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about protec.de
Protec | Schutzstopfen, Schutzkappen, Kunststoff Kappen und Stopfen, Kabelverschraubungen, Lamellenstopfen, Schraubstopfen, Schraubkappen, Dichtschrauben, Griffstopfen, Rohrschutzkappen, Rohrkappen
Visit protec.deWe analyzed Protec.de page load time and found that the first response time was 261 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
protec.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value5.6 s
17/100
25%
Value4.6 s
71/100
10%
Value860 ms
33/100
30%
Value0.127
82/100
15%
Value6.8 s
55/100
10%
261 ms
410 ms
318 ms
69 ms
32 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Protec.de, 1% (1 request) were made to Cdn.leadinfo.net and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (637 ms) belongs to the original domain Protec.de.
Page size can be reduced by 244.7 kB (13%)
1.8 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Protec.de main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 107.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 136.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Protec images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 38 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (48%)
58
30
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Protec. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
protec.de
261 ms
protec.de
410 ms
ping.js
318 ms
gtm.js
69 ms
uc.js
32 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
82 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
155 ms
jquery-1.12.4.min.js
352 ms
protecforms.js
220 ms
protecdropdowns.js
225 ms
protecutils.js
225 ms
bootstrap.min.css
424 ms
googlefonts.css
229 ms
style.css
368 ms
protec.css
301 ms
header.css
300 ms
responsive.css
305 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.css
444 ms
glyphicons.css
377 ms
jquery-3.3.1.min.js
630 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
424 ms
popper.min.js
434 ms
bootstrap.min.js
634 ms
jquery.sticky-kit.min.js
630 ms
modernizr.min.js
631 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js
637 ms
header-17-logo.png
272 ms
header_claim_9.png
274 ms
protec-blusignature-logo_small.png
275 ms
header-8-2-rufnummer.png
276 ms
header-8-3-laenderauswahl.png
278 ms
de.svg
278 ms
uk.svg
279 ms
us-eu.png
356 ms
fr.svg
357 ms
pl.svg
358 ms
closeSidebar.png
359 ms
merkzettel-icon-header-2.png
251 ms
Slider0.png
252 ms
Slider-Juni-21%20-%2011.jpg
394 ms
Slider-Juni-21%20-%2007.jpg
397 ms
Slider-Juni-21%20-%2001.jpg
397 ms
Slider-Juni-21%20-%2014.png
479 ms
Slider%20neue%20Bilder%20-%2002.png
482 ms
Index-Schutzkappen-mit-gewinde.png
316 ms
Index-Schutzkappen-ohne-gewinde.png
359 ms
Index-Quickfit-PA6-UL94.png
437 ms
Index-Quickfit-Messing.png
470 ms
Index-Prosicon-Stopfen-g%C3%BCnstig.png
475 ms
Index-Prosicon-Schlaeuche.png
474 ms
Index-Prosicon-Kappen-ab-lager-lieferbar.png
513 ms
Index-Durasafe-Polypropylen.png
550 ms
index-durasafe-pa6-2.png
554 ms
Index-Durasafe-Edelstahl.png
552 ms
logo-promould-box_05.png
557 ms
protec-blusignature-logo_default.png
559 ms
source-sans-pro-v11-latin-regular.woff
588 ms
source-sans-pro-v11-latin-300.woff
478 ms
source-sans-pro-v11-latin-200.woff
469 ms
source-sans-pro-v11-latin-600.woff
477 ms
source-sans-pro-v11-latin-700.woff
476 ms
source-sans-pro-v11-latin-900.woff
476 ms
teaser-zertifizierungen.png
501 ms
EP305-1140x220.png
544 ms
hamburger-bottombar2.png
543 ms
pagetop-bottombar.png
544 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
541 ms
protec-caqudupr-font-new-webfont.woff
547 ms
ProtecCustomFont.otf
570 ms
ProtecCaQuDuPrFontRegular.otf
540 ms
protec.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
protec.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
protec.de SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Protec.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Protec.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
protec.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Protec. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: