Tools & Wizards About Us
protectie.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

protectie.com

Gevelelementen Montage Kruijen - Home

Page Load Speed

8.6 sec in total

First Response

1.8 sec

Resources Loaded

6.4 sec

Page Rendered

405 ms

protectie.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to protectie.com homepage info - get ready to check Protectie best content right away, or after learning these important things about protectie.com

Specialist in Limburg op het gebied van het verduurzamen van woningen en gebouwen met betrekking tot kunststof kozijnen, zonwering, rolluiken en pelletkachels. We staan voor u klaar in elk seizoen!

Visit protectie.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Protectie.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

protectie.com performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,230 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.169

70/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.6 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

protectie.com

1829 ms

kruijen-frissen.nl

552 ms

home.aspx

530 ms

js

64 ms

bootstrap.min.css

1301 ms

Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Protectie.com, 63% (59 requests) were made to Kruijen-frissen.nl and 22% (21 requests) were made to Dealer.unilux.nl. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) relates to the external source Kruijen-frissen.nl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (45%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Protectie.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 968.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 45.1 kB

  • Original 53.3 kB
  • After minification 39.9 kB
  • After compression 8.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.4 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 18.9 kB

  • Original 852.6 kB
  • After minification 833.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Protectie images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 456.6 kB

  • Original 968.3 kB
  • After minification 944.2 kB
  • After compression 511.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 456.6 kB or 47% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 678.4 kB

  • Original 814.8 kB
  • After minification 679.5 kB
  • After compression 136.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Protectie.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 678.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (75%)

Requests Now

87

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Protectie. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

protectie.com

protectie.com

1829 ms

kruijen-frissen.nl

kruijen-frissen.nl

552 ms

home.aspx

home.aspx

530 ms

js

js

64 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1301 ms

settings.css

settings.css

1112 ms

layers.css

layers.css

1581 ms

navigation.css

navigation.css

694 ms

style.css

style.css

811 ms

orange.css

orange.css

1163 ms

line-icons.css

line-icons.css

787 ms

api.js

api.js

39 ms

logoKF.png

logoKF.png

878 ms

slider1.jpg

slider1.jpg

1501 ms

slider2.jpg

slider2.jpg

1296 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

35 ms

slider3.jpg

slider3.jpg

2096 ms

1282 ms

Voorjaarskorting.jpg

Voorjaarskorting.jpg

2258 ms

slider1.jpg

slider1.jpg

1248 ms

slider2.jpg

slider2.jpg

1333 ms

slider3.jpg

slider3.jpg

1339 ms

slider4.jpg

slider4.jpg

1424 ms

slider5.jpg

slider5.jpg

1431 ms

slider6.jpg

slider6.jpg

1451 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1753 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1413 ms

jquery.easing-1.3.min.js

jquery.easing-1.3.min.js

1414 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

1875 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

1596 ms

revolution.addon.slicey.min.js

revolution.addon.slicey.min.js

1504 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

1772 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

1778 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

1929 ms

jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js

jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js

1861 ms

setting.js

setting.js

1870 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

2038 ms

setting.js

setting.js

1960 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

2053 ms

setting.js

setting.js

2017 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

2053 ms

masonry.filter.js

masonry.filter.js

2069 ms

setting.js

setting.js

2105 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1863 ms

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

1705 ms

css

css

30 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

1675 ms

overwrite.css

overwrite.css

2231 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

1602 ms

masonry.css

masonry.css

1329 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

1288 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

1282 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

1198 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

89 ms

custom-style.css

custom-style.css

178 ms

jquery.dataTables.min.css

jquery.dataTables.min.css

266 ms

jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.css

jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.css

265 ms

flatsome.css

flatsome.css

361 ms

flatsome-shop.css

flatsome-shop.css

269 ms

style.css

style.css

274 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

358 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

352 ms

main.js

main.js

351 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

446 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

382 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

439 ms

prettify.css

prettify.css

1175 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

1282 ms

datetimepicker.css

datetimepicker.css

1176 ms

vegas.css

vegas.css

1114 ms

slider.css

slider.css

1167 ms

settings.js

settings.js

1186 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

44 ms

dealer_type_premium.png

dealer_type_premium.png

90 ms

type_true.png

type_true.png

90 ms

flatsome.js

flatsome.js

92 ms

chunk.slider.js

chunk.slider.js

91 ms

chunk.popups.js

chunk.popups.js

90 ms

chunk.tooltips.js

chunk.tooltips.js

90 ms

woocommerce.js

woocommerce.js

90 ms

section-heading-line.png

section-heading-line.png

206 ms

clients_bg.png

clients_bg.png

206 ms

img.jpg

img.jpg

608 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

136 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

136 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

474 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

124 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

182 ms

revicons90c6.woff

revicons90c6.woff

128 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

js

js

37 ms

js

js

42 ms

js

js

52 ms

collect

collect

36 ms

Accessibility Review

protectie.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

protectie.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

protectie.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Protectie.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Protectie.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

protectie.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Protectie. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: