1.5 sec in total
88 ms
922 ms
481 ms
Visit pulsem.me now to see the best up-to-date PulseM content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pulsem.me
pulseM is the #1 Online Review & Reputation Management Platform built for Home Service Companies! More Reviews = More Revenue at pulseM!
Visit pulsem.meWe analyzed Pulsem.me page load time and found that the first response time was 88 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
pulsem.me performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
67/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value8.8 s
16/100
10%
Value3,030 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.093
91/100
15%
Value25.8 s
0/100
10%
88 ms
135 ms
70 ms
22 ms
34 ms
Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Pulsem.me, 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Static.speetra.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (438 ms) belongs to the original domain Pulsem.me.
Page size can be reduced by 116.6 kB (10%)
1.2 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Pulsem.me main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 683.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 97.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 108 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. PulseM images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 15.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pulsem.me has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (68%)
93
30
The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PulseM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pulsem.me
88 ms
pulsem.me
135 ms
gtm.js
70 ms
style.min.css
22 ms
theme.min.css
34 ms
header-footer.min.css
32 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
35 ms
frontend.min.css
41 ms
swiper.min.css
34 ms
post-151.css
40 ms
frontend.min.css
48 ms
global.css
63 ms
post-7.css
61 ms
post-12.css
59 ms
post-167.css
129 ms
style.css
90 ms
mkto-form-base.css
90 ms
mkto-form-style.css
95 ms
fontawesome.min.css
91 ms
solid.min.css
95 ms
css
33 ms
brands.min.css
96 ms
animations.min.css
94 ms
6856781.js
124 ms
frontend.min.js
94 ms
jquery.min.js
149 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
124 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
148 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
147 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
149 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
150 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
163 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
150 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
176 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
163 ms
hooks.min.js
176 ms
i18n.min.js
176 ms
frontend.min.js
176 ms
waypoints.min.js
350 ms
core.min.js
199 ms
frontend.min.js
185 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
169 ms
css2
25 ms
js
90 ms
analytics.js
235 ms
heap-312514043.js
284 ms
heap-addons.js
230 ms
pulsem-logo.png
212 ms
Hero-background.jpg
206 ms
pulseM-Integrations-ServiceTitan-1-1.png
207 ms
pulseM-Integrations-Fieldedge-1-1.png
207 ms
successware-logo-2023.png
206 ms
pulseM-Google-Calendar-1.png
253 ms
zapier-logo-2.png
250 ms
pulseM-Integrations-Quickbooks-Online-1.png
254 ms
pulseM-Integrations-ConnectWise-1.png
250 ms
Housecall-Pro-Logo.png
253 ms
field-work-1.png
256 ms
pulseM-Acculynx-2-1.png
298 ms
pulseM-jobnimbus-1.png
297 ms
service-fusion.png
298 ms
MobilogicLogo300x83.png
297 ms
Sera-Logo-White.png
298 ms
three-star-element.png
409 ms
pulse-section-pattern-large.png
359 ms
5-white-stars.png
438 ms
star-background-pattern.png
330 ms
testimonial_on-time.png
357 ms
rescue-air-testimonial-II.png
324 ms
baker-brothers-testimonials.png
391 ms
renown-testimonial-I.png
406 ms
5-stars-yellow.png
433 ms
pulsem-favicon.png
382 ms
fb.js
275 ms
banner.js
270 ms
collectedforms.js
263 ms
conversations-embed.js
222 ms
6856781.js
270 ms
0c70df2e92c55926.min.js
256 ms
embed-pulsemweb-gsd.js
108 ms
ec-3.4.min.js
76 ms
munchkin.js
139 ms
fbevents.js
110 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
137 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf
171 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
187 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
189 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf
187 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
266 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
275 ms
eicons.woff
307 ms
collect
49 ms
h
43 ms
collect
62 ms
sync
125 ms
embed-web-chat.js
45 ms
ga-audiences
102 ms
munchkin.js
40 ms
visitWebPage
123 ms
ip.json
67 ms
sync
33 ms
tap.php
34 ms
log
26 ms
rum
37 ms
pulsem.me accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
pulsem.me best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
pulsem.me SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pulsem.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pulsem.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pulsem.me
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PulseM. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: