Tools & Wizards About Us
pup-e-tails.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

pup-e-tails.net

Pup-E-Tails| Pet Cleaning | Dog Grooming Service Torrance CA

Page Load Speed

804 ms in total

First Response

40 ms

Resources Loaded

293 ms

Page Rendered

471 ms

pup-e-tails.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Pup E Tails content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pup-e-tails.net

Pup-E-Tails is one of the best Dog and Cat Grooming Service in Torrance CA. We also Pet Cleaning near me, Dog Spa, Puppy Nail Trimming etc.

Visit pup-e-tails.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Pup-e-tails.net page load time and found that the first response time was 40 ms and then it took 764 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pup-e-tails.net performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.9 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value360 ms

72/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.367

29/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.6 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pup-e-tails.net

40 ms

pup-e-tails.net

16 ms

www.pup-e-tails.net

7 ms

www.pup-e-tails.net

18 ms

bootstrap.css

3 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Pup-e-tails.net, 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (124 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (71%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

409.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pup-e-tails.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 38.0 kB

  • Original 45.9 kB
  • After minification 31.6 kB
  • After compression 7.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.2 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 12.0 kB

  • Original 164.0 kB
  • After minification 152.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pup E Tails images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 839.3 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 821.7 kB
  • After compression 221.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 839.3 kB or 79% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 128.3 kB

  • Original 156.4 kB
  • After minification 132.7 kB
  • After compression 28.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pup-e-tails.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 128.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (34%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pup E Tails. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

pup-e-tails.net

pup-e-tails.net

40 ms

pup-e-tails.net

pup-e-tails.net

16 ms

www.pup-e-tails.net

www.pup-e-tails.net

7 ms

www.pup-e-tails.net

www.pup-e-tails.net

18 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

3 ms

settings.css

settings.css

8 ms

style.css

style.css

10 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

14 ms

js

js

124 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

17 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

14 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

17 ms

main-slider-script.js

main-slider-script.js

13 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

15 ms

jquery-ui.js

jquery-ui.js

98 ms

appear.js

appear.js

16 ms

script.js

script.js

16 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

8 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

9 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

9 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

4 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

2 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

2 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

2 ms

layer-1.png

layer-1.png

75 ms

logo.webp

logo.webp

28 ms

image-1.webp

image-1.webp

47 ms

image-3.webp

image-3.webp

46 ms

pattern-5.webp

pattern-5.webp

45 ms

title-icon.png

title-icon.png

44 ms

welcome.webp

welcome.webp

47 ms

welcome-mob.webp

welcome-mob.webp

49 ms

best-cat-grooming-services.webp

best-cat-grooming-services.webp

48 ms

best-dog-grooming-services.webp

best-dog-grooming-services.webp

48 ms

2.webp

2.webp

49 ms

3.webp

3.webp

50 ms

pattern-3.webp

pattern-3.webp

52 ms

wxperts_powerdby.jpg

wxperts_powerdby.jpg

49 ms

fb.png

fb.png

49 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

48 ms

yelp.png

yelp.png

50 ms

yp.png

yp.png

51 ms

g-review.png

g-review.png

51 ms

grooming-bg.jpg

grooming-bg.jpg

44 ms

flaticon.svg

flaticon.svg

52 ms

flaticon.woff

flaticon.woff

51 ms

fontawesome-webfont914c.woff

fontawesome-webfont914c.woff

51 ms

layer-1.png

layer-1.png

44 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

31 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

32 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

33 ms

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

35 ms

grooming-bg.jpg

grooming-bg.jpg

20 ms

layer-1.png

layer-1.png

19 ms

grooming-bg.jpg

grooming-bg.jpg

5 ms

Accessibility Review

pup-e-tails.net accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

pup-e-tails.net best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

pup-e-tails.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pup-e-tails.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pup-e-tails.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pup-e-tails.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pup E Tails. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: