Tools & Wizards About Us
puretesting.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 77

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 84% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    18% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

puretesting.com

Testing services,Software testing services,Software testing training ,Consulting software testing, Outsource software testing

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

547 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

128 ms

puretesting.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to puretesting.com homepage info - get ready to check Pure Testing best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about puretesting.com

Pure testing offers its software testing services and software testing training consultation for SDLC products in India, US, Europe and other parts of the world . We help our clients plan their test i...

Visit puretesting.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Puretesting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 547 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

puretesting.com performance score

77

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

73/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

36/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

65/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.064

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

94/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

puretesting.com

547 ms

style.css

73 ms

menu.css

114 ms

style.css

135 ms

jquery-1.js

154 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Puretesting.com, 10% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (547 ms) belongs to the original domain Puretesting.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 151.6 kB (29%)

Content Size

514.5 kB

After Optimization

363.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Puretesting.com main page is 514.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 367.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 13.9 kB

  • Original 18.3 kB
  • After minification 17.4 kB
  • After compression 4.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.9 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 46.7 kB

  • Original 367.0 kB
  • After minification 320.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Pure Testing needs image optimization as it can save up to 46.7 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 57.0 kB

  • Original 89.7 kB
  • After minification 84.3 kB
  • After compression 32.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 57.0 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 33.9 kB

  • Original 39.6 kB
  • After minification 31.3 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Puretesting.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 33.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (37%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pure Testing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

puretesting.com

puretesting.com

547 ms

style.css

style.css

73 ms

menu.css

menu.css

114 ms

style.css

style.css

135 ms

jquery-1.js

jquery-1.js

154 ms

hoverIntent.js

hoverIntent.js

149 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

150 ms

supersubs.js

supersubs.js

151 ms

content.css

content.css

171 ms

urchin.js

urchin.js

6 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

28 ms

background.png

background.png

66 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

150 ms

demo.gif

demo.gif

59 ms

software_testing.jpg

software_testing.jpg

303 ms

matter.jpg

matter.jpg

133 ms

product_development.jpg

product_development.jpg

81 ms

migration.jpg

migration.jpg

116 ms

iso_logo2.png

iso_logo2.png

131 ms

bottom-footer.png

bottom-footer.png

158 ms

Accessibility Review

puretesting.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

puretesting.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

puretesting.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Puretesting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Puretesting.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

puretesting.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pure Testing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: