3.4 sec in total
252 ms
2.8 sec
347 ms
Visit pyramid.cc now to see the best up-to-date PYRAMID content for Brazil and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pyramid.cc
Forsale Lander
Visit pyramid.ccWe analyzed Pyramid.cc page load time and found that the first response time was 252 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
pyramid.cc performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
74/100
10%
Value5.0 s
26/100
25%
Value3.7 s
85/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.1 s
86/100
10%
252 ms
306 ms
165 ms
264 ms
10 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Pyramid.cc, 34% (16 requests) were made to D3a12l3yff2695.cloudfront.net and 6% (3 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Minestore-themes.s3.amazonaws.com.
Page size can be reduced by 422.0 kB (11%)
3.9 MB
3.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Pyramid.cc main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 55.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. PYRAMID images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 202.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 202.4 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 100.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pyramid.cc needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 100.6 kB or 30% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (30%)
37
26
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PYRAMID. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
pyramid.cc
252 ms
www.pyramid.cc
306 ms
tm37462.js
165 ms
fonts.css
264 ms
font-awesome.min.css
10 ms
store-fe8d13debac54e5ecdbab773484dd7d2.css
14 ms
store-c50cba6537eeb9b56dfdd9a1c203f01e.js
17 ms
main-min.js
283 ms
usr
73 ms
req
97 ms
145 ms
pixel
15 ms
pixel
16 ms
F77A00FA20918AAA6.css
1152 ms
sync
72 ms
sync
86 ms
fbevents.js
174 ms
jquery.min.js
31 ms
mixpanel-2.2.min.js
15 ms
logo2.png
275 ms
badge_minestore-873b8e15d94eeeacbf18eda081c3c81d.png
14 ms
up2.png
299 ms
down2.png
320 ms
001.jpg
183 ms
002.jpg
69 ms
003.jpg
298 ms
004.jpg
292 ms
005.jpg
464 ms
006.jpg
418 ms
007.jpg
433 ms
008.jpg
475 ms
009.jpg
444 ms
010.jpg
461 ms
icon2.png
720 ms
analytics.js
68 ms
piwik.js
45 ms
ATgvSvg=
40 ms
g7Poc8jTNQnpm6fOKiZ8nUSQPhQtvGUfJ7Pfys6ZdSNhWNF+1JZMfN8ngT8SLCg2hbwStZ1zEHsHigZZDXroEFFQkcEbvu84Kx0U10nNxkTw0nw9tPH0D0AmfzDdP+RP1IEro
40 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
493 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
39 ms
28 ms
25 ms
collect
31 ms
108 ms
130 ms
152 ms
collect
10 ms
pyramid.cc accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
pyramid.cc best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
pyramid.cc SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pyramid.cc can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pyramid.cc main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pyramid.cc
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PYRAMID. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: