2.5 sec in total
856 ms
1.5 sec
156 ms
Click here to check amazing Readerschoice Phoenix Newtimes content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about readerschoice.phoenixnewtimes.com
We get about 93 days of summer each year, the experts say. But if you live in Phoenix, you know that our temperatures heat up in the spring and stay toasty well into fall. (They don’t call us the Vall...
Visit readerschoice.phoenixnewtimes.comWe analyzed Readerschoice.phoenixnewtimes.com page load time and found that the first response time was 856 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
readerschoice.phoenixnewtimes.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.6 s
2/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value16.6 s
0/100
10%
Value4,450 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.126
83/100
15%
Value34.7 s
0/100
10%
856 ms
109 ms
347 ms
160 ms
292 ms
Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Readerschoice.phoenixnewtimes.com, 23% (6 requests) were made to Cdn.oas-c17.adnxs.com and 15% (4 requests) were made to Assets.myvoicenation.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (856 ms) belongs to the original domain Readerschoice.phoenixnewtimes.com.
Page size can be reduced by 425.5 kB (67%)
634.5 kB
208.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Readerschoice.phoenixnewtimes.com main page is 634.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 346.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 330.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 200.1 kB, which is 58% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 330.2 kB or 95% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Readerschoice Phoenix Newtimes images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 79.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 79.0 kB or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Readerschoice.phoenixnewtimes.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (30%)
23
16
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Readerschoice Phoenix Newtimes. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
readerschoice.phoenixnewtimes.com
856 ms
main.css
109 ms
omnibar.css
347 ms
voting.css
160 ms
main.js
292 ms
omni.js
102 ms
145682781564056567954@Middle3,Middle,x95,x96,Top,Frame1
12 ms
ga.js
24 ms
citylogo.png
122 ms
10564781.182.jpg
379 ms
10545127.198.jpg
418 ms
nav-external-v1st.png
121 ms
1456354565
62 ms
__utm.gif
48 ms
1373491284
41 ms
plus.png
72 ms
1453933710
22 ms
down-arrow.png
61 ms
clear.png
89 ms
collect
64 ms
1332547442
62 ms
0
11 ms
1456773586
25 ms
easyxdm.min.js
144 ms
ga-audiences
39 ms
omni2.css
27 ms
readerschoice.phoenixnewtimes.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
readerschoice.phoenixnewtimes.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
readerschoice.phoenixnewtimes.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Readerschoice.phoenixnewtimes.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Readerschoice.phoenixnewtimes.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
readerschoice.phoenixnewtimes.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Readerschoice Phoenix Newtimes. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: