1.2 sec in total
57 ms
1.1 sec
57 ms
Welcome to ulta.panteratools.com homepage info - get ready to check Ulta Panteratools best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about ulta.panteratools.com
Visit ulta.panteratools.comWe analyzed Ulta.panteratools.com page load time and found that the first response time was 57 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
ulta.panteratools.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value24.9 s
0/100
10%
Value26.0 s
0/100
25%
Value24.9 s
0/100
10%
Value460 ms
61/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value25.1 s
0/100
10%
57 ms
164 ms
26 ms
54 ms
80 ms
Our browser made a total of 137 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (130 requests) were addressed to the original Ulta.panteratools.com, 2% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.cdnfonts.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (380 ms) belongs to the original domain Ulta.panteratools.com.
Page size can be reduced by 42.2 kB (2%)
2.4 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Ulta.panteratools.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 10.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ulta.panteratools.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 132 (98%)
135
3
The browser has sent 135 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ulta Panteratools. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 79 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 55 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ulta.panteratools.com
57 ms
ulta.panteratools.com
164 ms
default.css
26 ms
portal.css
54 ms
dhtmlxcalendar.css
80 ms
dhtmlxcalendar_dhx_skyblue.css
99 ms
dhtmlxcombo.css
101 ms
dhtmlxgrid.css
104 ms
dhtmlxtree.css
111 ms
dhtmlxtoolbar_dhx_web.css
114 ms
dhtmlxmenu_dhx_skyblue.css
121 ms
dhtmlxlayout.css
123 ms
dhtmlxLayout_dhx_skyblue.css
128 ms
dhtmlxEditor_dhx_web.css
131 ms
dhtmlxscheduler_pt2.css
133 ms
PJQ.css
136 ms
css
29 ms
libs.css
235 ms
app.css
168 ms
app.css
151 ms
app.css
153 ms
app.css
160 ms
app.css
161 ms
app.css
174 ms
app.css
176 ms
app.css
184 ms
app.css
183 ms
app.css
188 ms
app.css
197 ms
app.css
199 ms
app.css
207 ms
app.css
206 ms
app.css
210 ms
app.css
221 ms
app.css
222 ms
app.css
271 ms
app.css
272 ms
js
74 ms
loader.js
22 ms
css2
28 ms
app.css
268 ms
app.css
258 ms
app.css
230 ms
app.css
208 ms
app.css
187 ms
app.css
186 ms
app.css
182 ms
app.css
181 ms
app.css
179 ms
app.css
183 ms
app.css
175 ms
app.css
171 ms
app.css
164 ms
app.css
170 ms
app.css
168 ms
portal.css
181 ms
WebResource.axd
180 ms
dnncore.js
177 ms
dhtmlxcommon.js
169 ms
dhtmlxcalendar.js
172 ms
myriad-pro
111 ms
css
16 ms
dhtmlxcombo.js
165 ms
dhtmlxgrid.js
162 ms
dhtmlxgridcell.js
166 ms
dhtmlxgrid_group.js
160 ms
dhtmlxgrid_pgn.js
161 ms
dhtmlxgrid_srnd.js
158 ms
dhtmlxgrid_excell_sub_row.js
150 ms
dhtmlxgrid_excell_dhxcalendar.js
159 ms
dhtmlxgrid_excell_combo.js
158 ms
dhtmlxgrid_excell_clist.js
159 ms
dhtmlxgrid_excell_link.js
157 ms
dhtmlxgrid_filter.js
149 ms
dhtmlxgrid_selection.js
149 ms
dhtmlxgrid_drag.js
109 ms
dhtmlxgrid_markers.js
114 ms
dhtmlxgrid_nxml.js
117 ms
dhtmlxgrid_fast.js
117 ms
dhtmlxgrid_validation.js
118 ms
dhtmlxtree.js
118 ms
dhtmlxtree_ed.js
124 ms
dhtmlxtree_json.js
131 ms
dhtmlxtree_li.js
135 ms
dhtmlxtoolbar.js
134 ms
nevis
30 ms
dhtmlxmenu.js
139 ms
dhtmlxmenu_ext.js
138 ms
dhtmlxLayout.js
141 ms
dhtmlxcontainer.js
145 ms
dhtmlxEditor.js
151 ms
dhtmlxEditor_ext.js
151 ms
dhtmlxscheduler.js
151 ms
dhtmlxscheduler_agenda_view.js
153 ms
dhtmlxscheduler_tooltip.js
140 ms
dhtmlxscheduler_serialize2.js
131 ms
dhtmlxscheduler_pdf2.js
136 ms
libs.js
313 ms
app.js
217 ms
app.js
142 ms
app.js
141 ms
app.js
142 ms
app.js
150 ms
app.js
155 ms
app.js
155 ms
app.js
162 ms
app.js
159 ms
app.js
162 ms
app.js
157 ms
app.js
165 ms
app.js
170 ms
app.js
174 ms
app.js
170 ms
app.js
173 ms
app.js
177 ms
app.js
178 ms
app.js
179 ms
app.js
180 ms
app.js
184 ms
app.js
184 ms
app.js
181 ms
app.js
183 ms
app.js
181 ms
app.js
187 ms
app.js
191 ms
app.js
188 ms
app.js
186 ms
app.js
380 ms
app.js
371 ms
app.js
371 ms
app.js
369 ms
app.js
378 ms
ScriptResource.axd
367 ms
ScriptResource.axd
364 ms
js
371 ms
portal.js
365 ms
ulta_logo.gif
365 ms
ulta.panteratools.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
ulta.panteratools.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
ulta.panteratools.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ulta.panteratools.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Ulta.panteratools.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ulta.panteratools.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ulta Panteratools. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: