1.5 sec in total
104 ms
1.3 sec
69 ms
Visit webmail1.pair.com now to see the best up-to-date Webmail 1 Pair content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webmail1.pair.com
Access for pair.com clients to webmail.
Visit webmail1.pair.comWe analyzed Webmail1.pair.com page load time and found that the first response time was 104 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
webmail1.pair.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
12/100
10%
Value5.5 s
19/100
25%
Value5.8 s
50/100
10%
Value1,540 ms
13/100
30%
Value0.218
57/100
15%
Value11.1 s
20/100
10%
104 ms
111 ms
219 ms
15 ms
27 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Webmail1.pair.com, 37% (16 requests) were made to Rc.webmail.pair.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (228 ms) relates to the external source Google-analytics.com.
Page size can be reduced by 73.4 kB (16%)
463.0 kB
389.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Webmail1.pair.com main page is 463.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 326.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Webmail 1 Pair images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 43.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 43.3 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webmail1.pair.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (79%)
38
8
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webmail 1 Pair. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
webmail1.pair.com
104 ms
webmail.pair.com
111 ms
rc.webmail.pair.com
219 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
15 ms
pair_style.css
27 ms
bootstrap.css
60 ms
thickbox.css
38 ms
jquery.min.js
58 ms
common.min.js
38 ms
app.min.js
79 ms
jquery.js
155 ms
jstz.min.js
40 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
84 ms
thickbox.js
50 ms
coin-slider.min.js
51 ms
coin-slider-styles.css
77 ms
gtm.js
63 ms
pair-logo-new.png
74 ms
ga.js
76 ms
pair_webinars_tw_small.png
66 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
64 ms
js
94 ms
fbevents.js
50 ms
analytics.js
72 ms
insight.min.js
88 ms
uwt.js
84 ms
3391700.js
83 ms
__utm.gif
50 ms
collect
228 ms
collect
228 ms
banner.js
99 ms
3391700.js
144 ms
conversations-embed.js
92 ms
fb.js
93 ms
web-interactives-embed.js
112 ms
collect
20 ms
ga-audiences
46 ms
adsct
153 ms
adsct
81 ms
adsct
79 ms
adsct
100 ms
ga-audiences
27 ms
collect
4 ms
webmail1.pair.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
webmail1.pair.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
webmail1.pair.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webmail1.pair.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webmail1.pair.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
webmail1.pair.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webmail 1 Pair. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: