Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 60

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 54

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    19% of websites

compare.quoteyquotey.com

Cheap Car Insurance Quotes - Quotey Quotey Comparison Sites

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

300 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

292 ms

compare.quoteyquotey.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Compare Quotey content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about compare.quoteyquotey.com

Cheap Car Insurance Quotes with Quotey Quotey. We Compare over 130 insurers and comparison sites.

Visit compare.quoteyquotey.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Compare.quoteyquotey.com page load time and found that the first response time was 300 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

compare.quoteyquotey.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.9 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.052

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.3 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

compare.quoteyquotey.com

300 ms

www.quoteyquotey.com

619 ms

styles.css

267 ms

jquery-1.2.6.min.js

356 ms

top_offers.js

180 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Compare.quoteyquotey.com, 96% (64 requests) were made to Quoteyquotey.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Quoteyquotey.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 141.5 kB (20%)

Content Size

707.7 kB

After Optimization

566.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Compare.quoteyquotey.com main page is 707.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 515.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 24.8 kB

  • Original 30.1 kB
  • After minification 25.5 kB
  • After compression 5.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.6 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 8.0 kB

  • Original 515.4 kB
  • After minification 507.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Compare Quotey images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 90.4 kB

  • Original 140.7 kB
  • After minification 122.8 kB
  • After compression 50.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 90.4 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 18.3 kB

  • Original 21.5 kB
  • After minification 13.8 kB
  • After compression 3.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Compare.quoteyquotey.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (39%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

39

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Compare Quotey . We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

compare.quoteyquotey.com accessibility score

60

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

compare.quoteyquotey.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

compare.quoteyquotey.com SEO score

54

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Compare.quoteyquotey.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Compare.quoteyquotey.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Compare Quotey . Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: