2.1 sec in total
273 ms
1.7 sec
180 ms
Welcome to qccs.org homepage info - get ready to check Qccs best content right away, or after learning these important things about qccs.org
Buy a domain and see how a premium domain can be the best investment. Your business starts here. Buy a domain today.
Visit qccs.orgWe analyzed Qccs.org page load time and found that the first response time was 273 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
qccs.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.1 s
0/100
10%
Value9.0 s
1/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value1,660 ms
11/100
30%
Value0.216
58/100
15%
Value19.4 s
2/100
10%
273 ms
239 ms
62 ms
16 ms
59 ms
Our browser made a total of 129 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Qccs.org, 9% (11 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 7% (9 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (314 ms) relates to the external source Linkedin.com.
Page size can be reduced by 794.6 kB (63%)
1.3 MB
471.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Qccs.org main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 901.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.7 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Qccs needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 585.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 585.9 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 169.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qccs.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 169.5 kB or 59% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 83 (78%)
107
24
The browser has sent 107 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Qccs. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 51 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
qccs.org
273 ms
monetate.js
239 ms
application.css
62 ms
ng-modal.css
16 ms
angular.min.js
59 ms
ng-modal.js
29 ms
google_analytics.js
29 ms
google_oauth.js
30 ms
bold_chat.js
30 ms
eloqua.js
32 ms
hotjar.js
31 ms
adroll.js
34 ms
impactRadius.js
34 ms
in.js
87 ms
api.js
72 ms
api:client.js
82 ms
app.js
43 ms
cookies.js
33 ms
socialMedia.js
53 ms
countryDropdown.js
54 ms
monetate.js
53 ms
index.js
52 ms
lander.js
55 ms
seoPages.js
56 ms
sitePages.js
53 ms
search.js
56 ms
modal.js
56 ms
forms.js
60 ms
tldSelector.js
58 ms
setFixedTop.js
57 ms
searchBar.js
58 ms
currency.js
59 ms
trust.js
59 ms
conversion.js
47 ms
tdfs-inner.css
60 ms
tdfs-temp.css
59 ms
thankyou.css
59 ms
entry.js
8 ms
custom.js
13 ms
css
29 ms
fontawesome.min.css
10 ms
bd-icons.min.css
11 ms
ga.js
25 ms
foundation-A136666-2811-40ba-bff2-3df3af8bc2ae1.min.js
143 ms
userspace
314 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
17 ms
recaptcha__en.js
273 ms
all.js
302 ms
302 ms
logo-header-2x.png
123 ms
1476089741-0
289 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
197 ms
266 ms
hotjar-10205.js
267 ms
elqCfg.min.js
149 ms
bg-main-hilight-fade.jpg
131 ms
bg-select.png
131 ms
bg-target-bd-icon.png
131 ms
__utm.gif
106 ms
postmessageRelay
125 ms
foundation-tags-SD780-3f5b-4f28-957f-6e6dc25a7fc41.min.js
24 ms
__utm.gif
55 ms
__utm.gif
57 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTaRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff
54 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3bO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
54 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSqRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff
57 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzKRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff
57 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
55 ms
svrGP
102 ms
iframe
106 ms
anchor
72 ms
collect
158 ms
74 ms
framework
105 ms
1476089741-1
37 ms
200 ms
__utm.gif
20 ms
styles__ltr.css
21 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
160 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
66 ms
svrGP.aspx
65 ms
xd_arbiter.php
182 ms
xd_arbiter.php
241 ms
2172305219-idpiframe.js
181 ms
modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js
189 ms
s5G5viF55Zd620FDUE2o6cwnsrT1pToaK6kVmkloWvE.js
48 ms
webworker.js
47 ms
logo_48.png
47 ms
CrYjSnGjrRCn0pd9VQsnFOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.woff
153 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUbO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
153 ms
recaptcha__en.js
90 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
30 ms
svrGP.aspx
67 ms
iframerpc
35 ms
vms.js
87 ms
__utm.gif
16 ms
roundtrip.js
9 ms
542IK7HHBBFJJFENPFA7WX.js
88 ms
xd_arbiter.php
39 ms
bc.pv
98 ms
fbevents.hashing.js
36 ms
out
8 ms
35 ms
4 ms
28 ms
out
28 ms
out
28 ms
out
27 ms
out
28 ms
out
28 ms
out
31 ms
out
31 ms
24 ms
adsct
103 ms
u.php
76 ms
51 ms
pixel
69 ms
28 ms
bounce
22 ms
tap.php
25 ms
u.php
74 ms
u.php
83 ms
377928.gif
9 ms
u.php
85 ms
u.php
84 ms
u.php
81 ms
in
5 ms
sd
75 ms
match
82 ms
qccs.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
qccs.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
qccs.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qccs.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Qccs.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
qccs.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Qccs. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: