2.8 sec in total
254 ms
2.4 sec
146 ms
Click here to check amazing Qualitative Research content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about qualitative-research.net
Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research is a multilingual online journal. Its main aim is to promote discussion and cooperation between qualitative researchers from dif...
Visit qualitative-research.netWe analyzed Qualitative-research.net page load time and found that the first response time was 254 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
qualitative-research.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value3.5 s
63/100
25%
Value4.5 s
73/100
10%
Value1,120 ms
23/100
30%
Value0.037
100/100
15%
Value6.9 s
54/100
10%
254 ms
333 ms
194 ms
196 ms
199 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Qualitative-research.net, 2% (1 request) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Qualitative-research.net.
Page size can be reduced by 768.2 kB (80%)
960.1 kB
191.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Qualitative-research.net main page is 960.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 722.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Qualitative Research needs image optimization as it can save up to 8.1 kB or 70% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 569.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 569.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 176.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qualitative-research.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 176.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (81%)
47
9
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Qualitative Research. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
qualitative-research.net
254 ms
fqs
333 ms
pkp.css
194 ms
common.css
196 ms
common.css
199 ms
compiled.css
331 ms
jquery.min.js
684 ms
jqueryUi.min.js
686 ms
sidebar.css
290 ms
rightSidebar.css
293 ms
sitestyle.css
489 ms
journalStyleSheet.css
581 ms
shariff.complete.css
487 ms
jquery.tag-it.js
428 ms
jquery.cookie.js
527 ms
fontController.js
586 ms
general.js
587 ms
jqueryValidatorI18n.js
624 ms
Helper.js
678 ms
ObjectProxy.js
682 ms
Handler.js
684 ms
LinkActionRequest.js
721 ms
Feature.js
775 ms
SiteHandler.js
778 ms
UrlInDivHandler.js
780 ms
AutocompleteHandler.js
780 ms
ExtrasOnDemandHandler.js
782 ms
FormHandler.js
818 ms
AjaxFormHandler.js
872 ms
ClientFormHandler.js
875 ms
GridHandler.js
973 ms
LinkActionHandler.js
878 ms
SearchFormHandler.js
880 ms
ReportGeneratorFormHandler.js
914 ms
LuceneAutocompleteHandler.js
968 ms
jquery.pkp.js
971 ms
jquery.validate.js
976 ms
shariff.complete.js
1184 ms
jqueryUi.css
927 ms
jquery.pnotify.default.css
880 ms
pnotify.css
879 ms
notificationIcons.css
790 ms
homeHeaderTitleImage_en_US.gif
168 ms
atom10_logo.gif
167 ms
rss20_logo.gif
166 ms
rss10_logo.gif
168 ms
font-down.png
100 ms
font-default.png
100 ms
font-up.png
101 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
37 ms
qualitative-research.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
[lang] attributes do not have a valid value
qualitative-research.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
qualitative-research.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qualitative-research.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Qualitative-research.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
qualitative-research.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Qualitative Research. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: