1.7 sec in total
465 ms
994 ms
225 ms
Click here to check amazing Qualitycare content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about qualitycare.com
Visit qualitycare.comWe analyzed Qualitycare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 465 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
qualitycare.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
50/100
10%
Value3.6 s
60/100
25%
Value3.0 s
94/100
10%
Value160 ms
93/100
30%
Value0.099
90/100
15%
Value3.8 s
89/100
10%
465 ms
111 ms
110 ms
116 ms
139 ms
Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Qualitycare.com, 9% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (465 ms) belongs to the original domain Qualitycare.com.
Page size can be reduced by 19.5 kB (20%)
99.2 kB
79.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Qualitycare.com main page is 99.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 43.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Qualitycare images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 143 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (57%)
44
19
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Qualitycare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
qualitycare.com
465 ms
script.js
111 ms
style.css
110 ms
styles.css
116 ms
sociable.css
139 ms
jquery.js
153 ms
show_ads.js
5 ms
jquery.form.js
66 ms
scripts.js
146 ms
ca-pub-4505618834700869.js
75 ms
zrt_lookup.html
109 ms
show_ads_impl.js
69 ms
Page-BgSimpleGradient.jpg
106 ms
Header.jpg
182 ms
nav.png
104 ms
MenuItem.png
104 ms
Block-s.png
104 ms
Block-h.png
104 ms
Block-v.png
117 ms
Block-c.png
116 ms
BlockHeader.png
117 ms
BlockHeaderIcon.png
116 ms
BlockContentBullets.png
115 ms
Post-s.png
154 ms
Post-h.png
159 ms
Post-v.png
158 ms
PostDateIcon.png
157 ms
PostAuthorIcon.png
160 ms
nothumb.jpg
200 ms
PostCategoryIcon.png
206 ms
PostTagIcon.png
201 ms
PostCommentsIcon.png
204 ms
rssIcon.png
205 ms
Footer.png
226 ms
ga.js
13 ms
__utm.gif
48 ms
__utm.gif
47 ms
ads
231 ms
osd.js
4 ms
16492755349931135507
28 ms
abg.js
31 ms
m_js_controller.js
41 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
27 ms
s
27 ms
x_button_blue2.png
27 ms
qualitycare.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
qualitycare.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
qualitycare.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qualitycare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Qualitycare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
qualitycare.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Qualitycare. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: