Tools & Wizards About Us
qualityinservice.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

qualityinservice.com

qualityinservice.com

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

125 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

365 ms

qualityinservice.com screenshot

About Website

Visit qualityinservice.com now to see the best up-to-date Qualityinservice content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about qualityinservice.com

Visit qualityinservice.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Qualityinservice.com page load time and found that the first response time was 125 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

qualityinservice.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

qualityinservice.com

125 ms

qualityinservice.com

205 ms

css_xE-rWrJf-fncB6ztZfd2huxqgxu4WO-qwma6Xer30m4.css

37 ms

css_J_NMz0y7lFkuSMbT5hVb192ZrslmKL9IcTuW3RGwhiE.css

76 ms

css_gxJ9WrRnrj_aUaCaNiYAEUyIziL6Hn9FbZq0j4vAiBY.css

109 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Qualityinservice.com, 10% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (389 ms) relates to the external source Wd-edge.sharethis.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 242.6 kB (23%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

811.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Qualityinservice.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 734.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 23.1 kB

  • Original 31.7 kB
  • After minification 30.3 kB
  • After compression 8.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.1 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 39.1 kB

  • Original 734.5 kB
  • After minification 695.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Qualityinservice images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 125.7 kB

  • Original 218.6 kB
  • After minification 191.9 kB
  • After compression 93.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 125.7 kB or 57% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 54.7 kB

  • Original 69.6 kB
  • After minification 67.5 kB
  • After compression 14.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qualityinservice.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 54.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (39%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Qualityinservice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

qualityinservice.com

qualityinservice.com

125 ms

qualityinservice.com

qualityinservice.com

205 ms

css_xE-rWrJf-fncB6ztZfd2huxqgxu4WO-qwma6Xer30m4.css

css_xE-rWrJf-fncB6ztZfd2huxqgxu4WO-qwma6Xer30m4.css

37 ms

css_J_NMz0y7lFkuSMbT5hVb192ZrslmKL9IcTuW3RGwhiE.css

css_J_NMz0y7lFkuSMbT5hVb192ZrslmKL9IcTuW3RGwhiE.css

76 ms

css_gxJ9WrRnrj_aUaCaNiYAEUyIziL6Hn9FbZq0j4vAiBY.css

css_gxJ9WrRnrj_aUaCaNiYAEUyIziL6Hn9FbZq0j4vAiBY.css

109 ms

css_wOa785FJlC_2RWEvJceYUaIfVhjSnt7hI1C2FWpWVDo.css

css_wOa785FJlC_2RWEvJceYUaIfVhjSnt7hI1C2FWpWVDo.css

112 ms

js_UWQINlriydSoeSiGQxToOUdv493zEa7dpsXC1OtYlZU.js

js_UWQINlriydSoeSiGQxToOUdv493zEa7dpsXC1OtYlZU.js

149 ms

js_R9UbiVw2xuTUI0GZoaqMDOdX0lrZtgX-ono8RVOUEVc.js

js_R9UbiVw2xuTUI0GZoaqMDOdX0lrZtgX-ono8RVOUEVc.js

114 ms

js_OlWxEIHW_hynFFFjxON0O5W1QLVKOysyT7OLCH14bws.js

js_OlWxEIHW_hynFFFjxON0O5W1QLVKOysyT7OLCH14bws.js

145 ms

jsapi

jsapi

53 ms

js_onRPP7Aw9TBI0BiFzRuA_DZb0U_cfWk1mRNYzbFXMOw.js

js_onRPP7Aw9TBI0BiFzRuA_DZb0U_cfWk1mRNYzbFXMOw.js

145 ms

buttons.js

buttons.js

39 ms

js_I8yX6RYPZb7AtMcDUA3QKDZqVkvEn35ED11_1i7vVpc.js

js_I8yX6RYPZb7AtMcDUA3QKDZqVkvEn35ED11_1i7vVpc.js

145 ms

js_oh2AhsRnRfwMTg6MRjBifZGNjooh4IshXBrsnal5m5o.js

js_oh2AhsRnRfwMTg6MRjBifZGNjooh4IshXBrsnal5m5o.js

194 ms

css

css

54 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

180 ms

connect_light_medium_short.gif

connect_light_medium_short.gif

196 ms

btn_donateCC_LG.gif

btn_donateCC_LG.gif

276 ms

getAllAppDefault.esi

getAllAppDefault.esi

389 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

160 ms

bg.png

bg.png

59 ms

logotwo.png

logotwo.png

252 ms

slide-image-1.jpg

slide-image-1.jpg

153 ms

slide-image-2.jpg

slide-image-2.jpg

231 ms

slide-image-3.jpg

slide-image-3.jpg

163 ms

sidebar-bg.png

sidebar-bg.png

184 ms

GrahamSr%20(1).jpg

GrahamSr%20(1).jpg

200 ms

sdfgsdfg34.jpg

sdfgsdfg34.jpg

221 ms

2.png

2.png

271 ms

customer-service-principles.jpg

customer-service-principles.jpg

257 ms

Fishbone.gif

Fishbone.gif

269 ms

gfhhe545.png

gfhhe545.png

321 ms

heading-bg.png

heading-bg.png

290 ms

RapidSSL_SEAL-90x50.gif

RapidSSL_SEAL-90x50.gif

301 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

61 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

72 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

86 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

87 ms

collect

collect

46 ms

SEO Factors

qualityinservice.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qualityinservice.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Qualityinservice.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

qualityinservice.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Qualityinservice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: