1.7 sec in total
375 ms
1.1 sec
227 ms
Welcome to qualityoflife.net homepage info - get ready to check Quality Of Life best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about qualityoflife.net
Quality of Life offers high-quality nutritional products with ingredients 100% backed by clinical research. We have a great selection of nutritional supplements for your brain, cardiovascular health, ...
Visit qualityoflife.netWe analyzed Qualityoflife.net page load time and found that the first response time was 375 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
qualityoflife.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
24/100
10%
Value10.0 s
0/100
25%
Value10.0 s
9/100
10%
Value15,100 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.034
100/100
15%
Value36.4 s
0/100
10%
375 ms
78 ms
158 ms
33 ms
54 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Qualityoflife.net, 18% (10 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 16% (9 requests) were made to Secure.qualityoflife.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (470 ms) relates to the external source Secure.qualityoflife.net.
Page size can be reduced by 413.7 kB (47%)
886.0 kB
472.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Qualityoflife.net main page is 886.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 383.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 129.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 90.2 kB, which is 65% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 129.6 kB or 93% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Quality Of Life images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 118.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 118.6 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 143.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qualityoflife.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 143.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (23%)
53
41
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Quality Of Life. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
qualityoflife.net
375 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.custom.css
78 ms
combined.min.css
158 ms
jquery.min.js
33 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
54 ms
prototype.js
69 ms
scriptaculous.js
53 ms
header.min.js
225 ms
footer.min.js
82 ms
builder.js
12 ms
effects.js
13 ms
dragdrop.js
17 ms
controls.js
22 ms
slider.js
20 ms
sound.js
23 ms
print.css
66 ms
ga.js
32 ms
1454030127_facebook.png
232 ms
body_bg.png
77 ms
mainCont_bg.png
75 ms
checkout_btn.jpg
73 ms
header_mid_links_sep.jpg
75 ms
header_bg.png
134 ms
logo.png
180 ms
head-banner.png
178 ms
navigation_sep.jpg
133 ms
search_lnk.png
133 ms
go_btn.jpg
133 ms
midBanner2.png
168 ms
midBanner2_hov.png
148 ms
midBanner1.png
172 ms
midBanner1_hov.png
148 ms
midBanner3.png
184 ms
midBanner3_hov.png
183 ms
midBanner4.png
207 ms
midBanner4_hov.png
203 ms
midBanner5.png
213 ms
midBanner5_hov.png
211 ms
midBanner6.png
220 ms
midBanner6_hov.png
222 ms
1454030267_twitter.png
230 ms
1454030310_youtube.png
247 ms
1454030479_linkedin.png
247 ms
1454030629_pinterest.png
252 ms
QOL_All-Products_final.jpg
439 ms
QOL_AHCC_final.jpg
470 ms
QOL_VitaPQQ_final.jpg
416 ms
QOL_Serotonin_final.jpg
428 ms
hpNav-bord-first.gif
228 ms
hpNav-bord-last.gif
235 ms
slider_controls.png
237 ms
slide_bottom.png
240 ms
proxima_nova_bold-webfont.ttf
362 ms
proxima_nova_reg-webfont.ttf
319 ms
__utm.gif
75 ms
footer_bg.png
211 ms
proxima_nova_sbold-webfont.ttf
287 ms
qualityoflife.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.
Definition list items are not wrapped in <dl> elements
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
qualityoflife.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
qualityoflife.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qualityoflife.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Qualityoflife.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
qualityoflife.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Quality Of Life. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: