Tools & Wizards About Us
qualityselect.nl screenshot

Report Summary

  • 68

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

qualityselect.nl

QualitySelect

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

391 ms

Resources Loaded

4.5 sec

Page Rendered

270 ms

qualityselect.nl screenshot

About Website

Welcome to qualityselect.nl homepage info - get ready to check Quality Select best content right away, or after learning these important things about qualityselect.nl

uitzenden, detacheren, werving & selectie van secretarieel personeel

Visit qualityselect.nl

Key Findings

We analyzed Qualityselect.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 391 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

qualityselect.nl performance score

68

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

51/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.5 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

qualityselect.nl

391 ms

www.qualityselect.nl

933 ms

style.css

505 ms

chronicle-reset.css

258 ms

font-awesome.css

346 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Qualityselect.nl and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (933 ms) belongs to the original domain Qualityselect.nl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 696.0 kB (32%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Qualityselect.nl main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 14.4 kB

  • Original 18.1 kB
  • After minification 16.5 kB
  • After compression 3.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Quality Select images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 231.1 kB

  • Original 269.0 kB
  • After minification 167.8 kB
  • After compression 37.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 231.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 445.6 kB

  • Original 498.4 kB
  • After minification 366.4 kB
  • After compression 52.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qualityselect.nl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 445.6 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (53%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Quality Select. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

qualityselect.nl

qualityselect.nl

391 ms

www.qualityselect.nl

www.qualityselect.nl

933 ms

style.css

style.css

505 ms

chronicle-reset.css

chronicle-reset.css

258 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

346 ms

chronicle-lightbox.css

chronicle-lightbox.css

256 ms

chronicle-animations.css

chronicle-animations.css

514 ms

chronicle-stickytwo.css

chronicle-stickytwo.css

341 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

430 ms

chronicle-menu.css

chronicle-menu.css

395 ms

chronicle-slider-pro.css

chronicle-slider-pro.css

510 ms

chronicle-pink.css

chronicle-pink.css

433 ms

chronicle-responsive-leyouts.css

chronicle-responsive-leyouts.css

563 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

595 ms

chronicle-animations.js

chronicle-animations.js

595 ms

chronicle-totop.js

chronicle-totop.js

600 ms

chronicle-sticky.js

chronicle-sticky.js

652 ms

chronicle-menu.js

chronicle-menu.js

680 ms

chronicle-modernizr.custom.75180.js

chronicle-modernizr.custom.75180.js

682 ms

chronicle-lightbox-2.6.min.js

chronicle-lightbox-2.6.min.js

686 ms

chronicle-jquery.sliderPro.js

chronicle-jquery.sliderPro.js

906 ms

chronicle-homeslide.js

chronicle-homeslide.js

767 ms

AC_RunActiveContent.js

AC_RunActiveContent.js

768 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

281 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

279 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

460 ms

close.png

close.png

87 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

87 ms

prev.png

prev.png

88 ms

next.png

next.png

90 ms

opacity1.png

opacity1.png

93 ms

opacity2.png

opacity2.png

94 ms

footer-bg.jpg

footer-bg.jpg

165 ms

scroll-top-arrow.png

scroll-top-arrow.png

174 ms

quality-select-nederland-1.png

quality-select-nederland-1.png

169 ms

quality-select.jpg

quality-select.jpg

251 ms

quality-select-3.jpg

quality-select-3.jpg

334 ms

quality-select-2.jpg

quality-select-2.jpg

337 ms

qs1.jpg

qs1.jpg

337 ms

qs2.jpg

qs2.jpg

335 ms

qs3.jpg

qs3.jpg

337 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

228 ms

quality-select-nederland-1.png

quality-select-nederland-1.png

254 ms

quality-select.jpg

quality-select.jpg

508 ms

quality-select-3.jpg

quality-select-3.jpg

348 ms

qs2.jpg

qs2.jpg

423 ms

qs1.jpg

qs1.jpg

425 ms

qs3.jpg

qs3.jpg

428 ms

quality-select-2.jpg

quality-select-2.jpg

594 ms

Accessibility Review

qualityselect.nl accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

qualityselect.nl best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

qualityselect.nl SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qualityselect.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Qualityselect.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

qualityselect.nl

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Quality Select. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: