Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

quid.ma

Quid.ma - Actualités & Analyses

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

274 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

742 ms

quid.ma screenshot

About Website

Visit quid.ma now to see the best up-to-date Quid content for Morocco and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about quid.ma

Quid.ma, un site d'information, news et actualité. Actualité politique, info culture, décryptages, dépêches, sujets plus légers & sports au Maroc et à l'international

Visit quid.ma

Key Findings

We analyzed Quid.ma page load time and found that the first response time was 274 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

quid.ma performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.3 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value9,910 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.022

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.1 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

quid.ma

274 ms

quid.ma

415 ms

global.css

153 ms

font-awesome.min.css

305 ms

theme_plugins.css

305 ms

Our browser made a total of 150 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (104 requests) were addressed to the original Quid.ma, 5% (8 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 5% (8 requests) were made to I.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Quid.ma.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (28%)

Content Size

4.7 MB

After Optimization

3.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Quid.ma main page is 4.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 384.1 kB

  • Original 428.6 kB
  • After minification 428.3 kB
  • After compression 44.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 384.1 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 155.4 kB

  • Original 2.8 MB
  • After minification 2.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Quid images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 530.1 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 547.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 530.1 kB or 49% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 266.1 kB

  • Original 390.7 kB
  • After minification 382.6 kB
  • After compression 124.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Quid.ma needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 266.1 kB or 68% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (22%)

Requests Now

138

After Optimization

108

The browser has sent 138 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Quid. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

quid.ma accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

quid.ma best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

quid.ma SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Quid.ma can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Quid.ma main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Quid. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: