1.2 sec in total
11 ms
1.1 sec
88 ms
Visit qwoc.org now to see the best up-to-date Qwoc content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about qwoc.org
Visit qwoc.orgWe analyzed Qwoc.org page load time and found that the first response time was 11 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
qwoc.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value20.8 s
0/100
25%
Value7.5 s
27/100
10%
Value910 ms
31/100
30%
Value0.012
100/100
15%
Value7.1 s
52/100
10%
11 ms
374 ms
17 ms
27 ms
27 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Qwoc.org, 26% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (374 ms) belongs to the original domain Qwoc.org.
Page size can be reduced by 755.4 kB (20%)
3.7 MB
3.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Qwoc.org main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 105.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 105.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 265.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Qwoc images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 366.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 366.8 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qwoc.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.1 kB or 21% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (88%)
48
6
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Qwoc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
qwoc.org
11 ms
www.qwoc.org
374 ms
frontend.min.css
17 ms
jquery.comiseo.daterangepicker.css
27 ms
styles.css
27 ms
jquery-ui.css
34 ms
wpem-grid.min.css
28 ms
style.css
31 ms
jquery.timepicker.min.css
33 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
31 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
34 ms
post-7487.css
31 ms
global.css
31 ms
post-7.css
33 ms
css
41 ms
smartslider.min.css
31 ms
css
54 ms
n2.min.js
39 ms
smartslider-frontend.min.js
43 ms
ss-simple.min.js
37 ms
w-arrow-image.min.js
36 ms
jquery.min.js
43 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
38 ms
common.min.js
41 ms
core.min.js
41 ms
controlgroup.min.js
40 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
44 ms
button.min.js
48 ms
datepicker.min.js
50 ms
menu.min.js
45 ms
moment.min.js
50 ms
jquery.comiseo.daterangepicker.js
48 ms
content-event-listing.min.js
96 ms
jquery.deserialize.js
98 ms
event-ajax-filters.min.js
97 ms
jquery.timepicker.min.js
98 ms
scripts.min.js
105 ms
common.js
99 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
100 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
101 ms
waypoints.min.js
91 ms
frontend.min.js
87 ms
underscore.min.js
87 ms
wp-util.min.js
80 ms
frontend.min.js
81 ms
logo.png
79 ms
IMG_1204.jpg
125 ms
IMG_0655.jpg
123 ms
c2f8f9e2-9d0c0d34-opolja131100202.jpg
92 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff
100 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
121 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff
113 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
121 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff
121 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
114 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff
121 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
132 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVQ.woff
123 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf
131 ms
2sDfZG1Wl4LcnbuKjk0j.ttf
51 ms
2sDcZG1Wl4LcnbuCJW8zaGW8.ttf
50 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
50 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
49 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
52 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
52 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
52 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
51 ms
modules.ttf
22 ms
style.min.css
18 ms
qwoc.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
qwoc.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
qwoc.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qwoc.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Qwoc.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
qwoc.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Qwoc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: