2.5 sec in total
210 ms
2 sec
278 ms
Welcome to 2014.revision-party.net homepage info - get ready to check 2014 Revision Party best content for Belgium right away, or after learning these important things about 2014.revision-party.net
Revision 2014 is a demoparty in southwest Germany. It takes place from April 18th to 21st 2014 in the E Werk in Saarbruecken, Germany. Lots of competitions and events as well as international socializ...
Visit 2014.revision-party.netWe analyzed 2014.revision-party.net page load time and found that the first response time was 210 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
2014.revision-party.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
48/100
10%
Value3.4 s
67/100
25%
Value5.0 s
64/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.027
100/100
15%
Value4.4 s
84/100
10%
210 ms
564 ms
62 ms
192 ms
286 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original 2014.revision-party.net, 5% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (828 ms) belongs to the original domain 2014.revision-party.net.
Page size can be reduced by 270.7 kB (39%)
692.2 kB
421.5 kB
In fact, the total size of 2014.revision-party.net main page is 692.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 322.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.8 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 2014 Revision Party images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 122.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 122.9 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 128.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 2014.revision-party.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 128.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (19%)
37
30
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 2014 Revision Party. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
2014.revision-party.net
210 ms
2014.revision-party.net
564 ms
css
62 ms
2348ef23ed346820fc3088cdd1da8317.css
192 ms
5b93aa62c9cf3c1b5c88093bd248b403.css
286 ms
45932c198fccdbff0f43edc424c30d18.css
282 ms
56a95c38d9045b6929eab900e336981d.css
287 ms
44d04efdbec1cae905a1d3e5c3b7dcde.css
288 ms
a234be23e7022037dd037f0e11be138b.css
336 ms
5580969840428c63c842afd47dcbc2fd.css
374 ms
c176206c18cd3c35c76adf499e776375.js
573 ms
js
41 ms
ga.js
45 ms
header_bg_left.png
128 ms
header_bg_right.png
124 ms
raster.gif
126 ms
header.png
580 ms
navbar_stripe_link.png
245 ms
x897_y200_2c7fac_08.png
499 ms
arrow.png
248 ms
x172_y100_5a1d03_02.png
276 ms
x100_y100_f8c7f8_02.png
321 ms
x172_y100_f1d573_02.png
342 ms
x100_y100_7e6d0e_02.png
367 ms
x100_y100_817de0_04.png
410 ms
x100_y100_24fdb3_04.png
435 ms
x100_y100_8f1f27_04.png
459 ms
x100_y100_9c26c2_02.png
502 ms
x100_y100_222829_03.png
531 ms
x200_y100_3ebd98_03.png
551 ms
x100_y100_07e440_04.png
590 ms
x125_y100_51e0c9_02.png
593 ms
x103_y100_a46144_02.png
624 ms
x100_y100_a9f700_02.png
643 ms
x130_y100_ab9e4d_02.png
668 ms
x125_y100_1a8a06_02.png
684 ms
x100_y100_a5082a_02.png
685 ms
x113_y100_0e8d2c_02.png
717 ms
Exo2.0-SemiBoldItalic-webfont.woff
828 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
2014.revision-party.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
2014.revision-party.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
2014.revision-party.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 2014.revision-party.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 2014.revision-party.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
2014.revision-party.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 2014 Revision Party. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: