Tools & Wizards About Us
corporate.rosettastone.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

corporate.rosettastone.com

Official Rosetta Stone® | How Language Is Learned

Page Load Speed

21.8 sec in total

First Response

36 ms

Resources Loaded

20.9 sec

Page Rendered

864 ms

corporate.rosettastone.com screenshot

About Website

Visit corporate.rosettastone.com now to see the best up-to-date Corporate Rosetta Stone content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about corporate.rosettastone.com

Rosetta Stone's award-winning language learning program combines proven methods and the world's best speech recognition technology. Choose from 25 languages.

Visit corporate.rosettastone.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Corporate.rosettastone.com page load time and found that the first response time was 36 ms and then it took 21.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

corporate.rosettastone.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

44/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,880 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.141

78/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.5 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

corporate.rosettastone.com

36 ms

www.rosettastone.com

213 ms

datadog-rum.js

74 ms

8433aff4c7e2e7c7.css

247 ms

86ae2efac30569ab.css

235 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Corporate.rosettastone.com, 97% (73 requests) were made to Rosettastone.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Datadoghq-browser-agent.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.3 sec) relates to the external source Rosettastone.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 355.6 kB (22%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Corporate.rosettastone.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 343.5 kB

  • Original 499.6 kB
  • After minification 499.6 kB
  • After compression 156.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 343.5 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 12.1 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Corporate Rosetta Stone images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 54.9 kB
  • After minification 54.9 kB
  • After compression 54.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (17%)

Requests Now

72

After Optimization

60

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Corporate Rosetta Stone. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

corporate.rosettastone.com

corporate.rosettastone.com

36 ms

www.rosettastone.com

www.rosettastone.com

213 ms

datadog-rum.js

datadog-rum.js

74 ms

8433aff4c7e2e7c7.css

8433aff4c7e2e7c7.css

247 ms

86ae2efac30569ab.css

86ae2efac30569ab.css

235 ms

aaefbc23752dd03f.css

aaefbc23752dd03f.css

227 ms

polyfills-78c92fac7aa8fdd8.js

polyfills-78c92fac7aa8fdd8.js

167 ms

webpack-2120688830abbf97.js

webpack-2120688830abbf97.js

236 ms

framework-326f6104f1d6e0dc.js

framework-326f6104f1d6e0dc.js

232 ms

main-8777aa097e0c3a13.js

main-8777aa097e0c3a13.js

283 ms

_app-9b605b0ce954ca43.js

_app-9b605b0ce954ca43.js

382 ms

973-bef40aa678b7c690.js

973-bef40aa678b7c690.js

282 ms

5213-6423e516819488bd.js

5213-6423e516819488bd.js

284 ms

3186-0bb4dc333d69874d.js

3186-0bb4dc333d69874d.js

282 ms

5475-e7f504ef09dcf244.js

5475-e7f504ef09dcf244.js

282 ms

%5Blocale%5D-88a987f981c3dd35.js

%5Blocale%5D-88a987f981c3dd35.js

391 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

378 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

377 ms

get-immersed-en-US-800.53dcf396.png

get-immersed-en-US-800.53dcf396.png

267 ms

feel-supported-en-US-800.50ff4ffa.png

feel-supported-en-US-800.50ff4ffa.png

266 ms

express-yourself-en-US-800.fbbe77d1.png

express-yourself-en-US-800.fbbe77d1.png

272 ms

469 ms

individuals-1x.a8cbcfae.webp

individuals-1x.a8cbcfae.webp

269 ms

enterprise-1x.18a73388.webp

enterprise-1x.18a73388.webp

271 ms

schools-1x.d5d50541.webp

schools-1x.d5d50541.webp

270 ms

272 ms

271 ms

274 ms

273 ms

275 ms

276 ms

342 ms

277 ms

278 ms

278 ms

278 ms

282 ms

279 ms

280 ms

191 ms

195 ms

191 ms

183 ms

219 ms

207 ms

211 ms

144 ms

145 ms

213 ms

130 ms

131 ms

125 ms

116 ms

122 ms

135 ms

129 ms

131 ms

142 ms

142 ms

156 ms

319 ms

156 ms

161 ms

161 ms

20297 ms

175 ms

184 ms

182 ms

196 ms

210 ms

207 ms

218 ms

216 ms

dropdown-arrow.69a9dab1.svg

dropdown-arrow.69a9dab1.svg

217 ms

stats-bg-1625.40e3a058.svg

stats-bg-1625.40e3a058.svg

223 ms

Accessibility Review

corporate.rosettastone.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

corporate.rosettastone.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

corporate.rosettastone.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Corporate.rosettastone.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Corporate.rosettastone.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

corporate.rosettastone.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Corporate Rosetta Stone. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: