Tools & Wizards About Us
feem.rtu.lv screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

feem.rtu.lv

Faculty of Engineering Economics and Management | Sākums

Page Load Speed

7.9 sec in total

First Response

256 ms

Resources Loaded

7.4 sec

Page Rendered

279 ms

feem.rtu.lv screenshot

About Website

Visit feem.rtu.lv now to see the best up-to-date Feem Rtu content for Latvia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about feem.rtu.lv

RTU Faculty of Engineering Economics and Management website. Studies, Science, Internationalization, News, Events, Contacts

Visit feem.rtu.lv

Key Findings

We analyzed Feem.rtu.lv page load time and found that the first response time was 256 ms and then it took 7.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

feem.rtu.lv performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.4 s

59/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

feem.rtu.lv

256 ms

444 ms

feem

1136 ms

tcal_en_dots.js

349 ms

Main

661 ms

Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Feem.rtu.lv, 99% (84 requests) were made to Rtu.lv. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) relates to the external source Rtu.lv.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 218.8 kB (10%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Feem.rtu.lv main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 61.7 kB

  • Original 73.5 kB
  • After minification 70.1 kB
  • After compression 11.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 134.4 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Feem Rtu images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 3.9 kB

  • Original 141.8 kB
  • After minification 141.6 kB
  • After compression 137.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 18.7 kB

  • Original 67.4 kB
  • After minification 63.6 kB
  • After compression 48.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Feem.rtu.lv needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.7 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (27%)

Requests Now

78

After Optimization

57

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Feem Rtu. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

feem.rtu.lv

feem.rtu.lv

256 ms

444 ms

feem

feem

1136 ms

tcal_en_dots.js

tcal_en_dots.js

349 ms

Main

Main

661 ms

parsed_css_0d27245c1d5cddc317c32250fc713986.css

parsed_css_0d27245c1d5cddc317c32250fc713986.css

454 ms

parsed_js_5197bc75ec55489ff0e91a98862c241b.js

parsed_js_5197bc75ec55489ff0e91a98862c241b.js

644 ms

select2_locale_en.js

select2_locale_en.js

348 ms

common.css

common.css

348 ms

ievf.css

ievf.css

689 ms

privatedaddy.js

privatedaddy.js

690 ms

postscribe.min.js

postscribe.min.js

699 ms

unibit-cookies-enabler.js

unibit-cookies-enabler.js

782 ms

unibit-cookies-enabler.css

unibit-cookies-enabler.css

971 ms

accessibility.js

accessibility.js

990 ms

accessibility.css

accessibility.css

1001 ms

accessibility_local.css

accessibility_local.css

1002 ms

darken_light.png

darken_light.png

359 ms

go_to_top.png

go_to_top.png

418 ms

darken.png

darken.png

602 ms

logo_en.png

logo_en.png

618 ms

arrow_down.png

arrow_down.png

631 ms

dropdown_arrow.png

dropdown_arrow.png

658 ms

search2.png

search2.png

653 ms

b_RTU_ievf_slaideris.jpg

b_RTU_ievf_slaideris.jpg

1360 ms

arrow_left.png

arrow_left.png

929 ms

arrow_right.png

arrow_right.png

944 ms

go_down.png

go_down.png

957 ms

h_line.png

h_line.png

980 ms

s_RTU_phd_balticteach_tallinn.jpg

s_RTU_phd_balticteach_tallinn.jpg

985 ms

calendar_3x.png

calendar_3x.png

1256 ms

s_RTU_davis_mazais.jpg

s_RTU_davis_mazais.jpg

1270 ms

s_RTU_lielais_izlaidums_reitingam_rtulv.jpg

s_RTU_lielais_izlaidums_reitingam_rtulv.jpg

1283 ms

bg_pattern.png

bg_pattern.png

1305 ms

phone_icon.png

phone_icon.png

1312 ms

fb.png

fb.png

1582 ms

li.png

li.png

1615 ms

twx.png

twx.png

1626 ms

yt.png

yt.png

1633 ms

tt.png

tt.png

1638 ms

fl.png

fl.png

1686 ms

in.png

in.png

1907 ms

rss.png

rss.png

1940 ms

rtu.png

rtu.png

1953 ms

ortus.png

ortus.png

1958 ms

ranked_2021.png

ranked_2021.png

1963 ms

qs_stars_2019.png

qs_stars_2019.png

2010 ms

the_wur_2021.png

the_wur_2021.png

2196 ms

mp-regular.otf

mp-regular.otf

2388 ms

mp-bold.otf

mp-bold.otf

2196 ms

geo-regular.otf

geo-regular.otf

2210 ms

geo-bold.otf

geo-bold.otf

2238 ms

multirank.png

multirank.png

2204 ms

green_metric.png

green_metric.png

2357 ms

eduniversal_new.png

eduniversal_new.png

2203 ms

impact.png

impact.png

2303 ms

modal_bg.png

modal_bg.png

2201 ms

logo_en.svg

logo_en.svg

2218 ms

go_to_top.svg

go_to_top.svg

2238 ms

arrow_down.svg

arrow_down.svg

2174 ms

dropdown_arrow.svg

dropdown_arrow.svg

2186 ms

search2.svg

search2.svg

2202 ms

arrow_left.svg

arrow_left.svg

2219 ms

arrow_right.svg

arrow_right.svg

2235 ms

go_down.svg

go_down.svg

1991 ms

calendar_3x.svg

calendar_3x.svg

2157 ms

phone_icon.svg

phone_icon.svg

2171 ms

fb.svg

fb.svg

2181 ms

li.svg

li.svg

2215 ms

twx.svg

twx.svg

2190 ms

yt.svg

yt.svg

1992 ms

tt.svg

tt.svg

2142 ms

fl.svg

fl.svg

2156 ms

in.svg

in.svg

2180 ms

rss.svg

rss.svg

2215 ms

rtu.svg

rtu.svg

2193 ms

ortus.svg

ortus.svg

1993 ms

ranked_2021.svg

ranked_2021.svg

2144 ms

qs_stars_2019.svg

qs_stars_2019.svg

2156 ms

the_wur_2021.svg

the_wur_2021.svg

2179 ms

multirank.svg

multirank.svg

2217 ms

green_metric.svg

green_metric.svg

2194 ms

eduniversal_new.svg

eduniversal_new.svg

1996 ms

impact.svg

impact.svg

2075 ms

mail_icon.svg

mail_icon.svg

328 ms

Accessibility Review

feem.rtu.lv accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

feem.rtu.lv best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

feem.rtu.lv SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Feem.rtu.lv can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Feem.rtu.lv main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

feem.rtu.lv

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Feem Rtu. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: