Tools & Wizards About Us
old.readability-score.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 87% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

old.readability-score.com

Readability score | Readability test | Reading level calculator | Readable

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

581 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

old.readability-score.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Old Readability Score content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about old.readability-score.com

Readable, the most extensive readability checker. Readability tests: Flesch reading ease, Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Gunning Fox Index, SMOG Index & more

Visit old.readability-score.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Old.readability-score.com page load time and found that the first response time was 581 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

old.readability-score.com performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

63/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value180 ms

92/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.321

36/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.9 s

65/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

old.readability-score.com

581 ms

readable.com

91 ms

twenty20.css

26 ms

style.css

129 ms

jquery.min.js

103 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Old.readability-score.com, 32% (14 requests) were made to Readable.com and 30% (13 requests) were made to Media.readable.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (581 ms) belongs to the original domain Old.readability-score.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 103.6 kB (27%)

Content Size

390.5 kB

After Optimization

286.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Old.readability-score.com main page is 390.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 208.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 50.3 kB

  • Original 62.0 kB
  • After minification 56.6 kB
  • After compression 11.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 35.4 kB

  • Original 208.6 kB
  • After minification 173.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Old Readability Score needs image optimization as it can save up to 35.4 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 15.6 kB

  • Original 99.0 kB
  • After minification 98.5 kB
  • After compression 83.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 15.6 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 20.8 kB
  • After minification 20.8 kB
  • After compression 18.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Old.readability-score.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.3 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (43%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Old Readability Score. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

old.readability-score.com

old.readability-score.com

581 ms

readable.com

readable.com

91 ms

twenty20.css

twenty20.css

26 ms

style.css

style.css

129 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

103 ms

svgs-inline-min.js

svgs-inline-min.js

81 ms

flat.scss.css

flat.scss.css

174 ms

loadJs.php.min.js

loadJs.php.min.js

199 ms

lottie-player.js

lottie-player.js

194 ms

jquery.twenty20.js

jquery.twenty20.js

100 ms

jquery.event.move.js

jquery.event.move.js

157 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

157 ms

eb8454708c.js

eb8454708c.js

538 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

429 ms

l.js

l.js

428 ms

bars-white.png

bars-white.png

183 ms

7c74ea3205659159b8d03ff41ca51946

7c74ea3205659159b8d03ff41ca51946

427 ms

logo_blue_160.png

logo_blue_160.png

49 ms

logo_white_160.png

logo_white_160.png

190 ms

chevron-white.png

chevron-white.png

338 ms

readable_leader_framed.png

readable_leader_framed.png

426 ms

open-quote.png

open-quote.png

339 ms

close-quote.png

close-quote.png

338 ms

bars.png

bars.png

180 ms

lottie-player.js

lottie-player.js

188 ms

icon-pencil.png

icon-pencil.png

275 ms

check-circle-blue.png

check-circle-blue.png

202 ms

icon-globe.png

icon-globe.png

203 ms

icon-cog.png

icon-cog.png

241 ms

check-circle-blue.png

check-circle-blue.png

202 ms

profitwell.js

profitwell.js

108 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

77 ms

eb8454708c.css

eb8454708c.css

59 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

63 ms

font-awesome-css.min.css

font-awesome-css.min.css

56 ms

css

css

152 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

collect

collect

83 ms

shopify.png

shopify.png

145 ms

netflix.png

netflix.png

69 ms

harvard.png

harvard.png

44 ms

adobe.png

adobe.png

68 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

121 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

44 ms

Accessibility Review

old.readability-score.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

old.readability-score.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

old.readability-score.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Old.readability-score.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Old.readability-score.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

old.readability-score.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Old Readability Score. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: