3.8 sec in total
240 ms
2.9 sec
670 ms
Visit race-keeper.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Race Keeper content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about race-keeper.co.uk
Race-Keeper is one of the worlds leading brands of HD video & data logging equipment for motorsport applications
Visit race-keeper.co.ukWe analyzed Race-keeper.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 240 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
race-keeper.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value16.1 s
0/100
10%
Value33.0 s
0/100
25%
Value30.2 s
0/100
10%
Value1,880 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value47.3 s
0/100
10%
240 ms
162 ms
164 ms
171 ms
247 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Race-keeper.co.uk, 11% (7 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 5% (3 requests) were made to Use.edgefonts.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Race-keeper.com.
Page size can be reduced by 456.1 kB (24%)
1.9 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Race-keeper.co.uk main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.8 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 135.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Race Keeper images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 222.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 222.6 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 78.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Race-keeper.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 78.4 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (56%)
59
26
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Race Keeper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.race-keeper.com
240 ms
boilerplate.css
162 ms
rcstyle2015.css
164 ms
dmxNavigationMenu.css
171 ms
jquery-latest.pack.js
247 ms
mqd2nzb.js
162 ms
respond.min.js
169 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
241 ms
dmxNavigationMenu.js
321 ms
bebas-neue:n4:default.js
58 ms
style.css
322 ms
twitterstyle.css
328 ms
dmxHTML5VideoPlayer.js
331 ms
projekktor.min.js
489 ms
www.race-keeper.com
206 ms
www.race-keeper.com
125 ms
analytics.js
22 ms
top1.png
163 ms
logo2.png
257 ms
logo1.png
257 ms
login.png
169 ms
icon_facebook.gif
170 ms
icon_twitter.gif
170 ms
icon_youtube.gif
256 ms
down-trans.png
336 ms
top2_1.jpg
336 ms
top2_2.jpg
337 ms
top3_1.jpg
495 ms
top3_3.png
655 ms
JRM_Portimao_Sml.jpg
822 ms
Hyundai_CoDrive.jpg
655 ms
HollyH.jpg
660 ms
RWRE1.jpg
1084 ms
idash2.jpg
1051 ms
icon_facebook2.gif
815 ms
icon_twitter2.gif
818 ms
icon_youtube2.png
822 ms
FlFvMbsdSyQSmsNR1xVYVw6WoiyMotBbdD5sWigZoFXffwAQgsMdeMJ6Mk6fwyBuSh90ZAs1ZAZzd1sDOco8i26I.woff
141 ms
s_OWgIKZVd3My0GSSOOjMQDxyhszsvF5PaPDIuNPCT3ffwAQgsMdeMJ6Mk6g5Msfb2iRZeFKF2sKZQsyFhsK526aFhZcjQmRw2M3FhJtZebtFRmKwh4KjDwtwD6DwAZ8wcmywQSaZRjkwR9ajQqU5QI.woff
141 ms
collect
120 ms
index.html
945 ms
player_api
45 ms
mainrow1.jpg
833 ms
logo3.gif
835 ms
icon_arrow_green.png
837 ms
top3_2.jpg
987 ms
greenbarback1.jpg
1071 ms
bigtwitter1.png
993 ms
icon_arrow_black2.png
999 ms
icon_arrow_black3.png
1066 ms
start.png
1261 ms
buffering.gif
1145 ms
eklektik.png
1239 ms
ivvg_-SDMHH2AE3OdnkntCGto7-WLwai31ZQGwgzaHwff4eUgsMdeMJ6Mk6g5Msfb2iRZeFKF2sKZQsyFhsK526aFhZcjQmRw2M3FhJtZebtFRmKwh4KjDwtwD6DwAZ8wcmywQSaZRjkwR9ajQqU5QI.woff
61 ms
nx8Y50_JzJ-Yt1XXRlFRM0NCkCrkBGmDjOFODeBeQVCff4AUgsMdeMJ6Mk6g5Mifb2iRZeFKF2sKZQsyFhsK526aFhZcjQmRw2M3FhJtZebtFRmKwh4KjDwtwD6DwAZ8wcmywQSaZRjkwR9ajQqU5QI.woff
116 ms
mk5KL07ps17LkrjdaaRbXxTXO3JTMql_BV4Rn5jeRJjff4HUgsMdeMJ6Mk6g5Mofb2iRZeFKF2sKZQsyFhsK526aFhZcjQmRw2M3FhJtZebtFRmKwh4KjDwtwD6DwAZ8wcmywQSaZRjkwR9ajQqU5QI.woff
162 ms
bW9-W4-WYuXwcS976egWxH1H_9BigFhZFR25h12JQ33ff4-UgsMdeMJ6Mk6g5gBfb2iRZeFKF2sKZQsyFhsK526aFhZcjQmRw2M3FhJtZebtFRmKwh4KjDwtwD6DwAZ8wcmywQSaZRjkwR9ajQqU5QI.woff
152 ms
www-widgetapi.js
17 ms
p.gif
131 ms
pulse2.jpg
1244 ms
p.gif
109 ms
style.css
406 ms
moment.min.js
6 ms
twitterFetcher_min.js
414 ms
exampleUsage.js
483 ms
590447897038213120
334 ms
race-keeper.co.uk accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
race-keeper.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
race-keeper.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Race-keeper.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Race-keeper.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
race-keeper.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Race Keeper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: