6.3 sec in total
138 ms
3.9 sec
2.3 sec
Visit radnet.com now to see the best up-to-date Rad Net content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about radnet.com
RadNet has 350 outpatient imaging centers in California, New York, Maryland, Delaware, New Jersey & Florida.
Visit radnet.comWe analyzed Radnet.com page load time and found that the first response time was 138 ms and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
radnet.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value14.2 s
0/100
25%
Value10.4 s
8/100
10%
Value5,830 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.496
16/100
15%
Value20.1 s
2/100
10%
138 ms
765 ms
82 ms
123 ms
184 ms
Our browser made a total of 155 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (146 requests) were addressed to the original Radnet.com, 1% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (831 ms) belongs to the original domain Radnet.com.
Page size can be reduced by 366.4 kB (27%)
1.3 MB
983.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Radnet.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 805.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 76.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rad Net images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 261.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 261.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Radnet.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 116 (82%)
141
25
The browser has sent 141 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rad Net. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 54 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 64 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
radnet.com
138 ms
www.radnet.com
765 ms
system.base.css
82 ms
system.menus.css
123 ms
system.messages.css
184 ms
system.theme.css
187 ms
field.css
187 ms
node.css
188 ms
user.css
197 ms
views.css
197 ms
home.css
242 ms
board.css
246 ms
chome.css
247 ms
menu.css
248 ms
preview.css
261 ms
list.css
259 ms
story.css
301 ms
statesinfobox.css
304 ms
stockgraph.css
310 ms
payportals.css
309 ms
faculty.css
321 ms
fellows.css
316 ms
lectures.css
344 ms
locui.css
333 ms
divisionlist.css
335 ms
locationpage.css
335 ms
statelist.css
351 ms
mngmt.css
348 ms
newslist.css
379 ms
newscomment.css
380 ms
newssearch.css
384 ms
globenewswire.css
384 ms
solutions.css
405 ms
srvui.css
407 ms
styleguide.css
434 ms
svglib.css
437 ms
accreditation.css
440 ms
alphalist.css
420 ms
banner.css
443 ms
button.css
404 ms
calculator.css
367 ms
divider.css
367 ms
featured.css
403 ms
infobox.css
404 ms
menutree.css
424 ms
modal.css
426 ms
morebelow.css
406 ms
patternbox.css
403 ms
portals.css
402 ms
reveal.css
403 ms
reveals.css
394 ms
sharebar.css
397 ms
statistic.css
371 ms
surveys.css
371 ms
tabbed.css
370 ms
teaser.css
371 ms
titlebar.css
393 ms
walkins.css
389 ms
youtube.css
366 ms
document.css
370 ms
shared.css
433 ms
bootstrap-grid.css
374 ms
simplebar.css
394 ms
site.css
394 ms
ctools.css
371 ms
sitesearch.css
372 ms
google_tag.script.js
397 ms
jquery.js
552 ms
jquery-extend-3.4.0.js
405 ms
jquery-html-prefilter-3.5.0-backport.js
402 ms
jquery.once.js
386 ms
drupal.js
381 ms
admin_devel.js
378 ms
jquery.matchHeight-min.js
419 ms
knockout-min.js
453 ms
js.cookie.min.js
412 ms
utils.js
386 ms
ie.js
385 ms
events.js
831 ms
forms.js
787 ms
menuscroller.js
796 ms
mobile.js
768 ms
navigation.js
770 ms
notice.js
775 ms
quicklinks.js
777 ms
simplebar.min.js
802 ms
toolbar.js
774 ms
widgets.js
775 ms
appointments.js
773 ms
preview.js
780 ms
statesinfobox.js
764 ms
payportals.js
775 ms
geoPosition.js
749 ms
mapapi.js
747 ms
locui.js
750 ms
divisionlist.js
743 ms
statelist.js
723 ms
newssearch.js
695 ms
newsreader.js
697 ms
srvui.js
690 ms
widgets.js
684 ms
alphalist.js
663 ms
banner.js
662 ms
calculator.js
633 ms
featured.js
633 ms
infobox.js
623 ms
modal.js
624 ms
reveal.js
623 ms
sharebar.js
582 ms
statistics.js
567 ms
tabbed.js
565 ms
teaser.js
565 ms
youtube.js
528 ms
sitesearch.js
193 ms
background-pattern.jpg
377 ms
branding-logo.png
415 ms
logo-erad.png
397 ms
logo-radar.png
394 ms
logo-radinsure.png
392 ms
logo-breastlink.png
399 ms
locator-results-shadow.png
398 ms
menu-mobile-search-button.png
397 ms
background-top.jpg
417 ms
background-bottom.jpg
387 ms
radnet-home-background.jpg
618 ms
gradation-bkg.png
597 ms
glance-bkg.jpg
596 ms
glance-pointer-bkg.png
393 ms
gradation-pointer-bkg.png
387 ms
logo-erad-footer.png
384 ms
logo-radar-footer.png
384 ms
logo-radinsure-footer.png
382 ms
logo-breastlink-footer.png
585 ms
gtm.js
292 ms
bkg-50.png
276 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
240 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
242 ms
OpenSans-Bold-webfont.woff
242 ms
OpenSans-ExtraBold-webfont.woff
355 ms
asap-bold-webfont.woff
240 ms
asap-regular-webfont.woff
352 ms
merriweather-light-webfont.woff
353 ms
merriweather-regular-webfont.woff
354 ms
merriweather-bold-webfont.woff
357 ms
merriweather-italic-webfont.woff
356 ms
merriweather-lightitalic-webfont.woff
356 ms
merriweather-bolditalic-webfont.woff
357 ms
js
42 ms
analytics.js
441 ms
fbevents.js
502 ms
collect
162 ms
2374974472823163
50 ms
collect
32 ms
ga-audiences
111 ms
ae.js
46 ms
radnet.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
radnet.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
radnet.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Radnet.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Radnet.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
radnet.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rad Net. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: