Tools & Wizards About Us
radom.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 73

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

radom.net

Tworzenie stron internetowych, pozycjonowanie stron, sklepy internetowe - Konsorcjum Informatyczne Radom »

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

418 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

165 ms

radom.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to radom.net homepage info - get ready to check Radom best content for Poland right away, or after learning these important things about radom.net

Konsorcjum Informatyczne to przede wszystkim profesjonalne strony internetowe, funkcjonalne sklepy internetowe, a także skuteczne pozycjonowanie stron internetowych.

Visit radom.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Radom.net page load time and found that the first response time was 418 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

radom.net performance score

73

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

40/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

62/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

radom.net

418 ms

reset.css

290 ms

normalize.min.css

288 ms

wordpress.css

286 ms

style.css

287 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 19% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Radom.net, 66% (39 requests) were made to Konsorcjumit.pl and 15% (9 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (953 ms) relates to the external source Konsorcjumit.pl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 692.8 kB (60%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

461.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Radom.net main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 808.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 12.4 kB

  • Original 15.9 kB
  • After minification 15.2 kB
  • After compression 3.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 496.1 kB

  • Original 808.0 kB
  • After minification 311.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Radom needs image optimization as it can save up to 496.1 kB or 61% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 180.3 kB

  • Original 315.0 kB
  • After minification 261.5 kB
  • After compression 134.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 180.3 kB or 57% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 15.1 kB
  • After minification 15.1 kB
  • After compression 11.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Radom.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.0 kB or 27% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (48%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

30

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Radom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

radom.net

radom.net

418 ms

reset.css

reset.css

290 ms

normalize.min.css

normalize.min.css

288 ms

wordpress.css

wordpress.css

286 ms

style.css

style.css

287 ms

modernizr-2.6.2.min.js

modernizr-2.6.2.min.js

290 ms

meteor-slides.css

meteor-slides.css

288 ms

ngg_k2.css

ngg_k2.css

402 ms

pagenavi-css.css

pagenavi-css.css

402 ms

prototype.js

prototype.js

15 ms

scriptaculous.js

scriptaculous.js

19 ms

effects.js

effects.js

23 ms

lightbox.js

lightbox.js

416 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

528 ms

jquery.cycle.all.min.js

jquery.cycle.all.min.js

417 ms

ngg.slideshow.min.js

ngg.slideshow.min.js

416 ms

jquery.metadata.v2.js

jquery.metadata.v2.js

516 ms

jquery.touchwipe.1.1.1.js

jquery.touchwipe.1.1.1.js

517 ms

slideshow.js

slideshow.js

517 ms

cforms2012.css

cforms2012.css

518 ms

cforms.js

cforms.js

521 ms

image-horizontal-reel-scroll-slideshow.js

image-horizontal-reel-scroll-slideshow.js

632 ms

bgMain.jpg

bgMain.jpg

953 ms

builder.js

builder.js

6 ms

effects.js

effects.js

7 ms

dragdrop.js

dragdrop.js

9 ms

controls.js

controls.js

10 ms

slider.js

slider.js

10 ms

sound.js

sound.js

6 ms

calendar.css

calendar.css

118 ms

lightbox.css

lightbox.css

117 ms

logo.png

logo.png

232 ms

p1.png

p1.png

230 ms

p2.png

p2.png

232 ms

p3.png

p3.png

234 ms

p4.png

p4.png

233 ms

ever.png

ever.png

349 ms

p5.png

p5.png

235 ms

zdalnapomoc.png

zdalnapomoc.png

346 ms

kontakt.png

kontakt.png

461 ms

nz.png

nz.png

462 ms

identyfikacjaoff.png

identyfikacjaoff.png

242 ms

kampanieoff.png

kampanieoff.png

357 ms

wsparcieoff.png

wsparcieoff.png

358 ms

systemyoff.png

systemyoff.png

359 ms

cien.png

cien.png

120 ms

belkaHome.png

belkaHome.png

240 ms

trans.png

trans.png

358 ms

r1.jpg

r1.jpg

354 ms

r2.jpg

r2.jpg

467 ms

r3.jpg

r3.jpg

468 ms

r4.jpg

r4.jpg

473 ms

r5.jpg

r5.jpg

473 ms

r6.jpg

r6.jpg

468 ms

r7.jpg

r7.jpg

582 ms

box.png

box.png

583 ms

menuHome.png

menuHome.png

583 ms

piwik.js

piwik.js

235 ms

piwik.php

piwik.php

436 ms

Accessibility Review

radom.net accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

radom.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

radom.net SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    PL

  • Language Claimed

    PL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Radom.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Polish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Radom.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

radom.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Radom. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: