Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

ralcolor.net

Ral Colour. Ral colours chart.

Page Load Speed

6.2 sec in total

First Response

579 ms

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

ralcolor.net screenshot

About Website

Visit ralcolor.net now to see the best up-to-date Ral Color content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ralcolor.net

Ral Colours. Ral colour chart. Ral colour list.

Visit ralcolor.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Ralcolor.net page load time and found that the first response time was 579 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ralcolor.net performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

85/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

55/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,440 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.3 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ralcolor.net

579 ms

style.css

161 ms

show_ads.js

8 ms

40dbd4596c3cb151efc0250c8618ee03.js

325 ms

ca-pub-6094956424001148.js

208 ms

Our browser made a total of 244 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (218 requests) were addressed to the original Ralcolor.net, 3% (8 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 2% (6 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (724 ms) belongs to the original domain Ralcolor.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 97.8 kB (61%)

Content Size

160.0 kB

After Optimization

62.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Ralcolor.net main page is 160.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 81.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 72.0 kB

  • Original 81.6 kB
  • After minification 69.5 kB
  • After compression 9.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.1 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.0 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 27.3 kB
  • After minification 25.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ral Color images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 13.7 kB

  • Original 37.7 kB
  • After minification 37.5 kB
  • After compression 24.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 13.7 kB or 36% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 10.7 kB

  • Original 13.5 kB
  • After minification 11.5 kB
  • After compression 2.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ralcolor.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 230 (95%)

Requests Now

242

After Optimization

12

The browser has sent 242 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ral Color. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ralcolor.net accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

ralcolor.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ralcolor.net SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8;

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ralcolor.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ralcolor.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8;. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ral Color. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: