Access ralcolor.net. RAL COLOR -

ralcolor.net screenshot

62

Performance

Renders faster than
76% of other websites
94

Accessibility

Visual factors better than
that of 83% of websites
75

Best Practices

More advanced features
available than in
35% of websites
75

SEO

Google-friendlier than
32% of websites

First Response

214 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

889 ms

ralcolor.net screenshot

About Website

Visit ralcolor.net now to see the best up-to-date RAL COLOR content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ralcolor.net

Ral Colours. Ral colour chart. Ral colour list.

Visit ralcolor.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Ralcolor.net page load time and found that the first response time was 214 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.0 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

96/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,140 ms

22/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.165

71/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.5 s

30/100

10%

ralcolor.net

214 ms

style.css

64 ms

adsbygoogle.js

148 ms

w.js

25 ms

featured.jpg

115 ms

Our browser made a total of 254 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (218 requests) were addressed to the original Ralcolor.net, 4% (11 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com and 3% (8 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (873 ms) relates to the external source Mts0.google.com.

Content Size

722.2 kB

After Optimization

618.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Ralcolor.net main page is 722.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 442.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 84.8 kB

Original 98.3 kB
After minification 86.3 kB
After compression 13.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.0 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 17.4 kB

Original 178.0 kB
After minification 160.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RAL COLOR images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 697 B

Original 442.0 kB
After minification 442.0 kB
After compression 441.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

Original 3.8 kB
After minification 3.8 kB
After compression 2.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ralcolor.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Now

250

After Optimization

15

The browser has sent 250 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RAL COLOR. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Serves images with low resolution

High

Page has valid source maps

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

N/A
Encoding

UTF-8;

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ralcolor.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ralcolor.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8;. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

ralcolor.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RAL COLOR. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: