Tools & Wizards About Us
ramadainnlondon.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

ramadainnlondon.com

Home | Ramada in London

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

137 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

56 ms

ramadainnlondon.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ramada Inn London content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ramadainnlondon.com

Visit ramadainnlondon.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ramadainnlondon.com page load time and found that the first response time was 137 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ramadainnlondon.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value25.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value31.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50,480 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value58.1 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.ramadainnlondon.com

137 ms

minified.js

35 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

28 ms

polyfill.min.js

32 ms

thunderbolt-commons.8db75bde.bundle.min.js

15 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ramadainnlondon.com, 44% (23 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 25% (13 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (68%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

558.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Ramadainnlondon.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB
  • After compression 222.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 5.5 kB

  • Original 82.4 kB
  • After minification 76.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ramada Inn London images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 262.8 kB
  • After minification 262.8 kB
  • After compression 258.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (29%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ramada Inn London. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.ramadainnlondon.com

www.ramadainnlondon.com

137 ms

minified.js

minified.js

35 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

28 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

32 ms

thunderbolt-commons.8db75bde.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.8db75bde.bundle.min.js

15 ms

main.aaff206b.bundle.min.js

main.aaff206b.bundle.min.js

126 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

126 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

128 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

128 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

132 ms

browser-deprecation.bundle.es5.js

browser-deprecation.bundle.es5.js

127 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

126 ms

23AZ3080.jpg

23AZ3080.jpg

316 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

97 ms

pool%20bluer.jpg

pool%20bluer.jpg

251 ms

pool_JPG.jpg

pool_JPG.jpg

213 ms

%D0%98%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5%20WhatsApp%202024-02-13%20%D0%B2%2018_37%201.jpg

%D0%98%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5%20WhatsApp%202024-02-13%20%D0%B2%2018_37%201.jpg

1473 ms

%D0%98%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5%20WhatsApp%202024-02-13%20%D0%B2%2019_03_45_972a2da6.jpg

%D0%98%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5%20WhatsApp%202024-02-13%20%D0%B2%2019_03_45_972a2da6.jpg

195 ms

IMG_6868_JPG.jpg

IMG_6868_JPG.jpg

212 ms

IMG_6869_JPG.jpg

IMG_6869_JPG.jpg

349 ms

IMG_6341%201.jpg

IMG_6341%201.jpg

403 ms

Frame%20162.jpg

Frame%20162.jpg

405 ms

IMG_6310_JPG.jpg

IMG_6310_JPG.jpg

426 ms

IMG_6330_JPG.jpg

IMG_6330_JPG.jpg

493 ms

IMG_6283_JPG.jpg

IMG_6283_JPG.jpg

595 ms

%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%86%D0%B0%20%D0%BD%D0%B0%20%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%85.jpg

%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%86%D0%B0%20%D0%BD%D0%B0%20%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%85.jpg

492 ms

IMG_6856_JPG.jpg

IMG_6856_JPG.jpg

607 ms

IMG_6863_JPG.jpg

IMG_6863_JPG.jpg

649 ms

swimming.jpg

swimming.jpg

630 ms

IMG_6859_JPG.jpg

IMG_6859_JPG.jpg

711 ms

lounge.jpg

lounge.jpg

741 ms

IMG_6875_HEIC.png

IMG_6875_HEIC.png

742 ms

gym.jpg

gym.jpg

759 ms

Frame%20136.png

Frame%20136.png

919 ms

Business%20Class%20Rooms.jpg

Business%20Class%20Rooms.jpg

852 ms

89 ms

94 ms

91 ms

92 ms

85 ms

89 ms

121 ms

129 ms

127 ms

125 ms

126 ms

125 ms

file.woff

file.woff

605 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

6 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

17 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

7 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

5 ms

Accessibility Review

ramadainnlondon.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

ramadainnlondon.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ramadainnlondon.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ramadainnlondon.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ramadainnlondon.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ramadainnlondon.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ramada Inn London. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: