3.5 sec in total
938 ms
2.4 sec
188 ms
Visit randolphjames.com now to see the best up-to-date Randolphjames content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about randolphjames.com
Engagement Rings Loose Diamonds Bridal Jewelry Wedding Rings <meta property="fb:admins" content="100000376970616" />
Visit randolphjames.comWe analyzed Randolphjames.com page load time and found that the first response time was 938 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
randolphjames.com performance score
938 ms
267 ms
205 ms
207 ms
513 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Randolphjames.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Static.woopra.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (938 ms) belongs to the original domain Randolphjames.com.
Page size can be reduced by 494.7 kB (41%)
1.2 MB
708.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Randolphjames.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 588.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Randolphjames images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 322.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 322.9 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 123.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Randolphjames.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 123.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (51%)
53
26
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Randolphjames. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.randolphjames.com
938 ms
diamondstuds.css
267 ms
addons.css
205 ms
layout.css
207 ms
theme.css
513 ms
menu.css
219 ms
colorbox.css
285 ms
jm.slideshow.css
345 ms
prototype.js
675 ms
validation.js
350 ms
builder.js
291 ms
effects.js
482 ms
dragdrop.js
487 ms
controls.js
486 ms
slider.js
424 ms
js.js
513 ms
form.js
529 ms
menu.js
556 ms
translate.js
581 ms
cookies.js
573 ms
jquery.js
671 ms
jquery.easing.js
634 ms
jquery.dimensions.js
651 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
702 ms
jquery.accordion.js
701 ms
ja.script.js
717 ms
logo.png
326 ms
contactusimg.png
87 ms
FRONT_PAGE_TOP_BANNER-1.png
484 ms
FRONT_PAGE_LOOSE_DIAMOND_SERARCH-1.png
292 ms
engagement240x150.jpg
182 ms
246x150.jpg
96 ms
engagement-accents.jpg
165 ms
studs240x150.jpg
182 ms
diamondjewelry240x150.jpg
239 ms
anniversary-bands2.jpg
270 ms
clickratingsm.gif
276 ms
paypal.png
311 ms
secure90x72.gif
350 ms
upfront.png
350 ms
fedex.png
358 ms
horz_master_85pixels.gif
383 ms
form-button-left-bg.gif
402 ms
form-button-right-bg.gif
411 ms
botsl-bg.gif
410 ms
ga.js
26 ms
woopra.js
56 ms
arr_footer.gif
382 ms
controls.gif
412 ms
border.gif
444 ms
loading_background.png
458 ms
loading.gif
459 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
228 ms
print.css
75 ms
randolphjames.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Randolphjames.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Randolphjames.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
randolphjames.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Randolphjames. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: