3 sec in total
84 ms
2.2 sec
640 ms
Click here to check amazing Rate content for Jordan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rate.tel
Visit rate.telWe analyzed Rate.tel page load time and found that the first response time was 84 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
rate.tel performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
31/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value6.1 s
45/100
10%
Value1,270 ms
18/100
30%
Value0.055
98/100
15%
Value14.6 s
8/100
10%
84 ms
533 ms
93 ms
112 ms
141 ms
Our browser made a total of 111 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rate.tel, 93% (103 requests) were made to Visionxe.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (621 ms) relates to the external source Visionxe.com.
Page size can be reduced by 369.5 kB (14%)
2.7 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Rate.tel main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 246.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 246.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 122.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rate images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 83 (78%)
106
23
The browser has sent 106 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rate. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 64 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rate.tel
84 ms
visionxe.com
533 ms
styles.css
93 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
112 ms
woocommerce.css
141 ms
style.min.css
106 ms
theme.min.css
109 ms
header-footer.min.css
109 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
185 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
205 ms
swiper.min.css
161 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
197 ms
all.min.css
228 ms
v4-shims.min.css
233 ms
style.css
260 ms
css
52 ms
fontawesome.min.css
291 ms
solid.min.css
286 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
297 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
318 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
366 ms
hooks.min.js
377 ms
w.js
31 ms
jquery.min.js
398 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
390 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
385 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
409 ms
js.cookie.min.js
456 ms
woocommerce.min.js
460 ms
v4-shims.min.js
430 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
500 ms
scripts.js
489 ms
js
65 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
498 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
468 ms
wc-blocks.css
613 ms
animations.min.css
612 ms
i18n.min.js
611 ms
index.js
615 ms
index.js
615 ms
api.js
46 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
615 ms
order-attribution.min.js
531 ms
react.min.js
518 ms
deprecated.min.js
537 ms
dom.min.js
517 ms
react-dom.min.js
621 ms
escape-html.min.js
500 ms
element.min.js
527 ms
is-shallow-equal.min.js
523 ms
keycodes.min.js
455 ms
priority-queue.min.js
520 ms
compose.min.js
527 ms
private-apis.min.js
471 ms
redux-routine.min.js
518 ms
data.min.js
561 ms
lodash.min.js
481 ms
wc-blocks-registry.js
470 ms
url.min.js
512 ms
api-fetch.min.js
478 ms
g.gif
12 ms
wc-settings.js
477 ms
data-controls.min.js
445 ms
html-entities.min.js
428 ms
notices.min.js
455 ms
wc-blocks-middleware.js
516 ms
wc-blocks-data.js
507 ms
dom-ready.min.js
483 ms
a11y.min.js
485 ms
primitives.min.js
430 ms
warning.min.js
416 ms
blocks-components.js
471 ms
blocks-checkout.js
357 ms
order-attribution-blocks.min.js
424 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
414 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
431 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
382 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
406 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
497 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
504 ms
frontend.min.js
447 ms
waypoints.min.js
489 ms
font
14 ms
core.min.js
532 ms
frontend.min.js
524 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
467 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
481 ms
Gilgan-Regular.woff
500 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
482 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
504 ms
vxeLogo-copy.png
536 ms
darkBg.jpg
557 ms
visionXE_BillboardWhite.png
534 ms
radioHouspainter-1-1024x728.png
458 ms
TruckDeliveries.png
551 ms
BillboardYogaClasses2.png
547 ms
Bus-Shed-Pet-Clinic.png
469 ms
Billbord_FB_NB-1024x787.png
617 ms
Billbord_Sale_NB-1024x787.png
522 ms
free-arrow-next-icon-2825-thumb-150x150.png
505 ms
Truck_Phone_Number-1024x683.jpg
587 ms
Truck_yummy-1024x683.jpg
615 ms
logoTel-300x300xc.png
540 ms
artist.png
582 ms
clouds11.png
489 ms
Screenshot-2024-01-09-at-5.06.36%E2%80%AFPM.png
575 ms
apartment-1.png
599 ms
clouds.png
547 ms
footerLogo.png
586 ms
recaptcha__en.js
26 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
54 ms
rate.tel accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
rate.tel best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rate.tel SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rate.tel can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rate.tel main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rate.tel
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rate. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: