2.8 sec in total
81 ms
1.4 sec
1.3 sec
Click here to check amazing Ratliff Companies content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ratliffcompanies.com
A fully-integrated real estate development firm with a primary focus on single-family and mixed-use projects serving Dallas-Fort Worth.
Visit ratliffcompanies.comWe analyzed Ratliffcompanies.com page load time and found that the first response time was 81 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
ratliffcompanies.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value11.5 s
0/100
25%
Value6.3 s
42/100
10%
Value480 ms
59/100
30%
Value0.033
100/100
15%
Value9.4 s
30/100
10%
81 ms
54 ms
119 ms
17 ms
172 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ratliffcompanies.com, 79% (58 requests) were made to Robertsoncompanies.com and 14% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (845 ms) relates to the external source Robertsoncompanies.com.
Page size can be reduced by 157.0 kB (2%)
6.7 MB
6.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Ratliffcompanies.com main page is 6.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 6.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 138.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 138.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ratliff Companies images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 6.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ratliffcompanies.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (41%)
59
35
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ratliff Companies. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ratliffcompanies.com
81 ms
www.robertsoncompanies.com
54 ms
www.robertsoncompanies.com
119 ms
style.min.css
17 ms
all.css
172 ms
pum-site-styles.css
91 ms
style-static.min.css
129 ms
robertson-companies-divi-public.css
35 ms
style.css
33 ms
v4-shims.css
177 ms
js
93 ms
et-core-unified-tb-951-tb-120-10.min.css
87 ms
et-core-unified-10.min.css
91 ms
et-core-unified-tb-951-tb-120-deferred-10.min.css
45 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
115 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
57 ms
jquery.min.js
71 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
86 ms
scripts.min.js
383 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
113 ms
core.min.js
114 ms
pum-site-scripts.js
161 ms
common.js
383 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
168 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
385 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
384 ms
magnific-popup.js
266 ms
salvattore.js
379 ms
css
86 ms
RC-Horizontal_RGB.svg
336 ms
hero-home-1.jpg
158 ms
RC-Vertical_RGB.svg
153 ms
img-bg-rc.jpg
339 ms
BD-Vertical_RGB.svg
333 ms
img-bg-barco.jpg
337 ms
RR-Vertical_RGB.svg
266 ms
img-bg-realty.jpg
268 ms
img-RobertsonHeadshots_26-home.jpg
338 ms
company-logos-slide1-v2.png
334 ms
icon-arrow.svg
440 ms
logo-barco-development.svg
438 ms
logo-robertson-realty.svg
436 ms
iStock-1255927618.jpg
442 ms
Team-Photo-1.jpg
688 ms
img-kingsway-thumb.jpg
635 ms
img-rolling-ridge-p2-thumb.jpg
734 ms
img-rolling-ridge-1.jpg
704 ms
img-tinsley-meadows-%E2%80%93-1.jpg
703 ms
imgtavolo.jpg
700 ms
640x480.jpg
845 ms
img-teasly-meadows-feature.jpg
699 ms
img-rolling-ridge-featured.jpg
713 ms
img-home-start-project.jpg
831 ms
logo-rc-reverse.svg
798 ms
img-calerie-sheffield.jpg
818 ms
Michael-Headshot.jpg
743 ms
img-Dana-cioffre.jpg
752 ms
Melanie-Headshot.jpg
756 ms
Debi-Hensley-Headshot.jpg
724 ms
Bryan-Headshot.jpg
661 ms
Rainelle-Headshot.jpg
671 ms
Gayle-Headshot.jpg
684 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfJpbERKSiw.woff
192 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfJpbERKSiA.ttf
193 ms
5aU69_a8oxmIdGd4Ag.woff
294 ms
5aU69_a8oxmIdGd4AQ.ttf
312 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfMJaERKSiw.woff
308 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfMJaERKSiA.ttf
311 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfLZcERKSiw.woff
309 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfLZcERKSiA.ttf
311 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfNJdERKSiw.woff
308 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfNJdERKSiA.ttf
311 ms
modules.woff
741 ms
ratliffcompanies.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ratliffcompanies.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ratliffcompanies.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ratliffcompanies.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ratliffcompanies.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ratliffcompanies.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ratliff Companies. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: