Tools & Wizards About Us
ratliffconsultants.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

ratliffconsultants.com

Welcome! | Therapy in South-West Houston, TX | Ratliff Consultants, Inc

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

26 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

146 ms

ratliffconsultants.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ratliff Consultants content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ratliffconsultants.com

Dr. Candy H. Ratliff is a Psychotherapist specializing in individual, couples, and family therapy, and maintains a private practice in Houston, TX. Call today 832-978-8572!

Visit ratliffconsultants.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ratliffconsultants.com page load time and found that the first response time was 26 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ratliffconsultants.com performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.265

46/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.8 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ratliffconsultants.com

26 ms

ratliffconsultants.com

172 ms

www.ratliffconsultants.com

66 ms

www.ratliffconsultants.com

269 ms

style.css

157 ms

Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Ratliffconsultants.com, 10% (8 requests) were made to Cdcssl.ibsrv.net and 2% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Ratliffconsultants.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 210.3 kB (40%)

Content Size

530.3 kB

After Optimization

320.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ratliffconsultants.com main page is 530.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 353.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 47.9 kB

  • Original 58.0 kB
  • After minification 48.1 kB
  • After compression 10.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.9 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 20.2 kB

  • Original 44.5 kB
  • After minification 24.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ratliff Consultants needs image optimization as it can save up to 20.2 kB or 45% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 136.9 kB

  • Original 353.8 kB
  • After minification 353.6 kB
  • After compression 216.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 136.9 kB or 39% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

  • Original 74.1 kB
  • After minification 74.0 kB
  • After compression 68.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ratliffconsultants.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (81%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ratliff Consultants. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ratliffconsultants.com

ratliffconsultants.com

26 ms

ratliffconsultants.com

ratliffconsultants.com

172 ms

www.ratliffconsultants.com

www.ratliffconsultants.com

66 ms

www.ratliffconsultants.com

www.ratliffconsultants.com

269 ms

style.css

style.css

157 ms

video-js.min.css

video-js.min.css

152 ms

video-js.custom.min.css

video-js.custom.min.css

180 ms

custom_redactor.css

custom_redactor.css

161 ms

styles.css

styles.css

173 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

167 ms

featuredblocks.css

featuredblocks.css

309 ms

martindale-icons.css

martindale-icons.css

308 ms

martindale-outline-icons.css

martindale-outline-icons.css

305 ms

jquery.mmenu.all.css

jquery.mmenu.all.css

315 ms

navigation.css

navigation.css

330 ms

more_nav.css

more_nav.css

317 ms

colorbox.css

colorbox.css

461 ms

custom-icons.css

custom-icons.css

467 ms

default.css

default.css

456 ms

cta.css

cta.css

459 ms

form.css

form.css

458 ms

leaflet.css

leaflet.css

474 ms

ada-toolbar.css

ada-toolbar.css

606 ms

mobileheader.css

mobileheader.css

601 ms

mobileheader-bg.css

mobileheader-bg.css

603 ms

sandra-grey.min.css

sandra-grey.min.css

613 ms

custom.css

custom.css

618 ms

retlif_photo.jpg.webp

retlif_photo.jpg.webp

126 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

476 ms

jquery-3.5.1.js

jquery-3.5.1.js

40 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

31 ms

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

490 ms

video.min.js

video.min.js

825 ms

Youtube.js

Youtube.js

741 ms

Vimeo.js

Vimeo.js

750 ms

plugin.showmore_onready.js

plugin.showmore_onready.js

748 ms

plugin.link_to_section.js

plugin.link_to_section.js

719 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

759 ms

jquery.bxslider.js

jquery.bxslider.js

862 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

876 ms

slider.js

slider.js

900 ms

sliderLazy.js

sliderLazy.js

897 ms

CampaignTracker.min.js

CampaignTracker.min.js

38 ms

smb-number-changer.js

smb-number-changer.js

64 ms

js

js

70 ms

featuredblocks.js

featuredblocks.js

905 ms

jquery.mmenu.min.all.js

jquery.mmenu.min.all.js

829 ms

jquery.sticky.js

jquery.sticky.js

852 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

864 ms

colorbox.min.js

colorbox.min.js

903 ms

me.cb.js

me.cb.js

887 ms

formUploadField.js

formUploadField.js

880 ms

form.js

form.js

822 ms

leaflet.js

leaflet.js

911 ms

ib-map.js

ib-map.js

863 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

889 ms

iframeResizer.contentWindow.js

iframeResizer.contentWindow.js

891 ms

jquery.dotdotdot.js

jquery.dotdotdot.js

886 ms

jquery.move-element.js

jquery.move-element.js

817 ms

jquery.fittext.js

jquery.fittext.js

855 ms

global.js

global.js

910 ms

theme.js

theme.js

899 ms

Capture.PNG

Capture.PNG

954 ms

Business_1.jpg.webp

Business_1.jpg.webp

99 ms

Couple_1.jpg.webp

Couple_1.jpg.webp

99 ms

Family_1.jpg.webp

Family_1.jpg.webp

117 ms

GayCouple_1.jpg.webp

GayCouple_1.jpg.webp

115 ms

schedule-appointment.jpg.webp

schedule-appointment.jpg.webp

112 ms

download.jpg.webp

download.jpg.webp

112 ms

helpful-forms.jpg.webp

helpful-forms.jpg.webp

112 ms

bg.png

bg.png

610 ms

roboto-regular-webfont.woff

roboto-regular-webfont.woff

752 ms

Montserrat-Bold-webfont.woff

Montserrat-Bold-webfont.woff

788 ms

Lato-Semibold.ttf

Lato-Semibold.ttf

1496 ms

Fradm.ttf

Fradm.ttf

1069 ms

Montserrat-Regular-webfont.woff

Montserrat-Regular-webfont.woff

824 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

940 ms

roboto-bold-webfont.woff

roboto-bold-webfont.woff

897 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

25 ms

iframe_api

iframe_api

40 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

4 ms

bx_loader.gif

bx_loader.gif

208 ms

controls.png

controls.png

113 ms

Accessibility Review

ratliffconsultants.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ratliffconsultants.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

ratliffconsultants.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ratliffconsultants.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ratliffconsultants.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ratliffconsultants.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ratliff Consultants. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: