Tools & Wizards About Us
rayshousekeeping.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    48% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

rayshousekeeping.com

Rays Housekeeping Services - Top Home Cleaning and House Keeping Services in Lucknow

Page Load Speed

22.4 sec in total

First Response

690 ms

Resources Loaded

20.8 sec

Page Rendered

906 ms

rayshousekeeping.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rays Housekeeping content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rayshousekeeping.com

Rays Housekeeping Services in LDA Colony, Lucknow is one of the leading businesses in the Housekeeping Services with 42 photos. Rated 5.0 based on 4 Ratings and Reviews. Also known for Sofa Cleaning S...

Visit rayshousekeeping.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rayshousekeeping.com page load time and found that the first response time was 690 ms and then it took 21.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

rayshousekeeping.com performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.4 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value240 ms

85/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.1 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rayshousekeeping.com

690 ms

bootstrap.min.css

403 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

397 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

421 ms

magnific-popup.css

425 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Rayshousekeeping.com, 11% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.1 sec) relates to the external source Soilsonenterprises.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 151.6 kB (6%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

2.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rayshousekeeping.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 32.7 kB

  • Original 39.3 kB
  • After minification 30.9 kB
  • After compression 6.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.4 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 30.1 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rays Housekeeping images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 45.7 kB

  • Original 232.4 kB
  • After minification 232.4 kB
  • After compression 186.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 45.7 kB or 20% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 43.0 kB

  • Original 105.4 kB
  • After minification 103.7 kB
  • After compression 62.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rayshousekeeping.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 43.0 kB or 41% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (56%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rays Housekeeping. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rayshousekeeping.com

rayshousekeeping.com

690 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

403 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

397 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

421 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

425 ms

animate.css

animate.css

441 ms

boxicons.min.css

boxicons.min.css

442 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

594 ms

meanmenu.css

meanmenu.css

604 ms

nice-select.css

nice-select.css

627 ms

odometer.css

odometer.css

636 ms

style.css

style.css

877 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

662 ms

sanitization-banner.png

sanitization-banner.png

999 ms

service_16.jpg

service_16.jpg

20146 ms

Washroom%2Bcleaning.jpg

Washroom%2Bcleaning.jpg

187 ms

y7svjzkll7bbzp6rjgnz.jpg

y7svjzkll7bbzp6rjgnz.jpg

82 ms

Surfers_Paradise_Shop_Front_window_cleaning.jpg

Surfers_Paradise_Shop_Front_window_cleaning.jpg

1807 ms

sofa-carpet-cleaning-services-500x500.jpg

sofa-carpet-cleaning-services-500x500.jpg

678 ms

shutterstock-752921533-car-washing-services-2-cm5j6.jpg

shutterstock-752921533-car-washing-services-2-cm5j6.jpg

770 ms

embed

embed

219 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

67 ms

372108180_WHATSAPP_ICON_400.gif

372108180_WHATSAPP_ICON_400.gif

1528 ms

jquery-3.5.1.slim.min.js

jquery-3.5.1.slim.min.js

983 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

799 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1043 ms

jquery.meanmenu.js

jquery.meanmenu.js

842 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

876 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

1012 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

1061 ms

jquery.nice-select.min.js

jquery.nice-select.min.js

1098 ms

parallax.min.js

parallax.min.js

1096 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

1178 ms

odometer.min.js

odometer.min.js

1212 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.min.js

bootstrap-datepicker.min.js

1240 ms

form-validator.min.js

form-validator.min.js

1269 ms

contact-form-script.js

contact-form-script.js

2369 ms

jquery.ajaxchimp.min.js

jquery.ajaxchimp.min.js

1317 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1373 ms

logo.png

logo.png

1998 ms

1.png

1.png

1446 ms

about-img.jpg

about-img.jpg

1685 ms

about-child.jpg

about-child.jpg

1535 ms

001.jpg

001.jpg

1761 ms

home.jpg

home.jpg

1653 ms

003.jpg

003.jpg

1753 ms

manpower-service-500x500.png

manpower-service-500x500.png

1921 ms

004.jpg

004.jpg

2058 ms

js

js

37 ms

search.js

search.js

3 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

6 ms

main.js

main.js

11 ms

005.jpg

005.jpg

1511 ms

006.jpg

006.jpg

1579 ms

css2

css2

27 ms

css2

css2

43 ms

appointment-bg.jpg

appointment-bg.jpg

1228 ms

footer-bg.jpg

footer-bg.jpg

1597 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHvxk.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHvxk.ttf

32 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USew8.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USew8.ttf

44 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVew8.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVew8.ttf

50 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

61 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAw.ttf

86 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

62 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

61 ms

Flaticon.svg

Flaticon.svg

1241 ms

Flaticon.woff

Flaticon.woff

1233 ms

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2PHA.ttf

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2PHA.ttf

49 ms

boxicons.woff

boxicons.woff

2116 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

207 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

658 ms

Accessibility Review

rayshousekeeping.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

rayshousekeeping.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rayshousekeeping.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rayshousekeeping.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rayshousekeeping.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rayshousekeeping.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rays Housekeeping. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: