2.8 sec in total
37 ms
2.5 sec
250 ms
Welcome to razorranking.com homepage info - get ready to check Razorranking best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about razorranking.com
Visit razorranking.comWe analyzed Razorranking.com page load time and found that the first response time was 37 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
razorranking.com performance score
37 ms
4 ms
490 ms
32 ms
10 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Razorranking.com, 13% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (490 ms) belongs to the original domain Razorranking.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (6%)
23.4 MB
22.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Razorranking.com main page is 23.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 22.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 378.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Razorranking images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 523.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 523.2 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 371.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Razorranking.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 371.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (56%)
52
23
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Razorranking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
razorranking.com
37 ms
cctal
4 ms
490 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
32 ms
font-awesome.min.css
10 ms
style.css
11 ms
owl.carousel.css
16 ms
front.css
10 ms
settings.css
13 ms
logos.css
11 ms
css
28 ms
css
38 ms
bootstrap.css
18 ms
font-awesome.min.css
24 ms
pixeden-icons.css
16 ms
style.css
52 ms
responsive.css
25 ms
cctal
23 ms
jquery.js
32 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
29 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
30 ms
owl.carousel.js
25 ms
scripts-general.js
30 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
38 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
39 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
43 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.js
35 ms
logos.js
38 ms
bootstrap.min.js
60 ms
jquery.knob.js
67 ms
smoothscroll.js
44 ms
scrollReveal.js
42 ms
zerif.js
59 ms
wp-embed.min.js
59 ms
377 ms
loading.gif
28 ms
CCTAL-Logo.jpg
179 ms
telephone65-blue.png
25 ms
envelope4-green.png
24 ms
BENCH-01-LOW.jpg
27 ms
KimRhodri-21.jpg
26 ms
constructing_excellence_awards_2014_101.jpg
187 ms
CENE-Awards-513.jpg
193 ms
CENE-Awards-452.jpg
299 ms
15534148020_201814a0d8_b.jpg
182 ms
Untitled-1.png
160 ms
Cyfle-Logo.jpg
216 ms
Coleg-Sir-Gar-Trinity.jpg
182 ms
CITB.gif
162 ms
EFOD-SWW.jpg
178 ms
map25-redish.png
166 ms
4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf
156 ms
BTu4SsVveqk58cdYjlaM9g.ttf
154 ms
zpv3sOKAbMf4wff105oLjw.ttf
155 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
172 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
151 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
152 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
152 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
152 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
153 ms
loader.gif
64 ms
shadow1.png
64 ms
bullet.png
65 ms
large_left.png
62 ms
large_right.png
63 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
29 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
31 ms
razorranking.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Razorranking.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Razorranking.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
razorranking.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Razorranking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: