Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 48

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

rccdivider.com

Alam Enterprises - Manufacturer of Compound Walls & Concrete Boundary Wall from Thane

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

91 ms

Resources Loaded

662 ms

Page Rendered

249 ms

rccdivider.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rccdivider.com homepage info - get ready to check Rccdivider best content right away, or after learning these important things about rccdivider.com

Compound Walls, Concrete Boundary Wall & Readymade Precast Wall Manufacturer offered by Alam Enterprises from Thane, Maharashtra, India

Visit rccdivider.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rccdivider.com page load time and found that the first response time was 91 ms and then it took 911 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rccdivider.com performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

73/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

83/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value630 ms

47/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.135

80/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.2 s

62/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rccdivider.com

91 ms

www.rccdivider.com

89 ms

www.rccdivider.com

388 ms

dtstyle_8_min.css

18 ms

zero.gif

3 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Rccdivider.com, 40% (2 requests) were made to Tdw.imimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (388 ms) belongs to the original domain Rccdivider.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 114.9 kB (70%)

Content Size

164.2 kB

After Optimization

49.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Rccdivider.com main page is 164.2 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 135.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 114.8 kB

  • Original 135.5 kB
  • After minification 134.8 kB
  • After compression 20.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 25 B

  • Original 28.7 kB
  • After minification 28.7 kB
  • After compression 28.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rccdivider.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rccdivider. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

rccdivider.com accessibility score

48

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rccdivider.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

rccdivider.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rccdivider.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rccdivider.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rccdivider. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: