5.3 sec in total
955 ms
4 sec
294 ms
Click here to check amazing RCT Construction content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rctconstruction.co.uk
BeArchitect | Best WordPress theme for architects
Visit rctconstruction.co.ukWe analyzed Rctconstruction.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 955 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
rctconstruction.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.5 s
1/100
10%
Value19.5 s
0/100
25%
Value12.1 s
4/100
10%
Value220 ms
88/100
30%
Value0.555
13/100
15%
Value13.3 s
12/100
10%
955 ms
205 ms
236 ms
18 ms
233 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Rctconstruction.co.uk, 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to S660851267.websitehome.co.uk. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Rctconstruction.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 867.6 kB (19%)
4.5 MB
3.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Rctconstruction.co.uk main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 71.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 76.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RCT Construction images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 685.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 685.0 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rctconstruction.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 34.5 kB or 30% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (84%)
50
8
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RCT Construction. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.rctconstruction.co.uk
955 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
205 ms
layerslider.css
236 ms
css
18 ms
styles.css
233 ms
settings.css
231 ms
style.css
228 ms
base.css
224 ms
layout.css
355 ms
shortcodes.css
439 ms
animations.min.css
344 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
341 ms
prettyPhoto.css
338 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.css
343 ms
responsive.css
475 ms
css
16 ms
css
17 ms
style.css
455 ms
style.min.css
453 ms
greensock.js
792 ms
jquery.js
638 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
554 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
820 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
620 ms
layerslider.custom.transitions.js
585 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
837 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
850 ms
svgxuse.js
743 ms
jquery.form.min.js
682 ms
scripts.js
829 ms
core.min.js
799 ms
widget.min.js
839 ms
mouse.min.js
855 ms
sortable.min.js
889 ms
tabs.min.js
884 ms
accordion.min.js
900 ms
plugins.js
1304 ms
menu.js
949 ms
animations.min.js
963 ms
jplayer.min.js
1028 ms
translate3d.js
866 ms
scripts.js
949 ms
comment-reply.min.js
900 ms
wp-embed.min.js
940 ms
rct_logo_sm.jpg
227 ms
rts_slider_04.jpg
866 ms
rts_slider_03.jpg
865 ms
aviary_1484673424363.png
1129 ms
rct_logo_white-300x49.png
418 ms
box_shadow.png
383 ms
font
24 ms
mfn-icons.woff
586 ms
skin.css
108 ms
rctconstruction.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rctconstruction.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rctconstruction.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rctconstruction.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rctconstruction.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rctconstruction.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RCT Construction. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: