Access re.vu. Collect More Google Reviews with One Simple Link

Report Summary

About Website

Click here to check amazing Re content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about re.vu

Turn happy customers into 5-star reviews with one simple link. Let customers tap or scan to leave a Google review — with other platforms available if they prefer. Built for local businesses.

Visit re.vu

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value20.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,350 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.039

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value32.1 s

0/100

10%

re.vu

376 ms

reviewthere.com

1151 ms

all.min.css

78 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

156 ms

10-layout.css

309 ms

Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Re.vu, 86% (67 requests) were made to Reviewthere.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Reviewthere.com.

Content Size

909.7 kB

After Optimization

701.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Re.vu main page is 909.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 347.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 84.2 kB

Original 105.9 kB
After minification 101.0 kB
After compression 21.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 38.0 kB

Original 297.7 kB
After minification 259.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Re needs image optimization as it can save up to 38.0 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 47.7 kB

Original 347.3 kB
After minification 347.3 kB
After compression 299.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 47.7 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 38.3 kB

Original 158.9 kB
After minification 158.5 kB
After compression 120.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Re.vu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 38.3 kB or 24% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Re. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Re.vu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Re.vu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

re.vu

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Re. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Collect More Google Reviews with One Simple Link | re.vu

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)