1.7 sec in total
175 ms
1.3 sec
161 ms
Click here to check amazing Readability Score content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about readability-score.com
Readable, the most extensive readability checker. Readability tests: Flesch reading ease, Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Gunning Fox Index, SMOG Index & more
Visit readability-score.comWe analyzed Readability-score.com page load time and found that the first response time was 175 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
readability-score.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value3.4 s
68/100
25%
Value5.5 s
55/100
10%
Value420 ms
66/100
30%
Value0.319
36/100
15%
Value5.8 s
67/100
10%
175 ms
357 ms
36 ms
82 ms
71 ms
Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Readability-score.com, 9% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Gumroad.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (651 ms) relates to the external source Apollopad.com.
Page size can be reduced by 67.3 kB (45%)
150.6 kB
83.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Readability-score.com main page is 150.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 64.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.1 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Readability Score needs image optimization as it can save up to 18.1 kB or 28% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 7.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 7.6 kB or 27% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Readability-score.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 56% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (63%)
19
7
The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Readability Score. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
readability-score.com
175 ms
readability-score.com
357 ms
jquery-ui.css
36 ms
screen.css
82 ms
jquery.min.js
71 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
100 ms
gumroad.js
98 ms
print.css
80 ms
gumroad-overlay-70ff2a66d89f2a3434d169b884a285f03f2378f039b3cb3a1bee411240e7fc1e.js
67 ms
logo.png
651 ms
ga.js
93 ms
logo.png
163 ms
loading.gif
236 ms
divider.png
237 ms
pencil.png
238 ms
link.png
239 ms
bell.png
241 ms
pdf.png
246 ms
page_white_excel.png
312 ms
star.png
311 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
overlay_page
11 ms
readability-score.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
readability-score.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
readability-score.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Readability-score.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Readability-score.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
readability-score.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Readability Score. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: