Tools & Wizards About Us
readability.io screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

readability.io

LLCBuddy® - Your Business Formation & Management Buddy

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

290 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

440 ms

readability.io screenshot

About Website

Visit readability.io now to see the best up-to-date Readability content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about readability.io

Comprehensive guides on LLC and business formation and management essentials with LLCBuddy - your business formation & management partner.

Visit readability.io

Key Findings

We analyzed Readability.io page load time and found that the first response time was 290 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

readability.io performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value310 ms

78/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.4 s

60/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

readability.io

290 ms

readability.io

655 ms

css2

57 ms

all.css

72 ms

bootstrap.min.css

80 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Readability.io, 12% (2 requests) were made to Stackpath.bootstrapcdn.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (858 ms) relates to the external source Widget.cloudpayments.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 161.4 kB (31%)

Content Size

515.0 kB

After Optimization

353.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Readability.io main page is 515.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 369.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 21.2 kB

  • Original 28.0 kB
  • After minification 23.0 kB
  • After compression 6.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.0 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.2 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 134.5 kB

  • Original 369.0 kB
  • After minification 234.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Readability needs image optimization as it can save up to 134.5 kB or 36% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 66 B

  • Original 81.0 kB
  • After minification 81.0 kB
  • After compression 81.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 5.6 kB

  • Original 36.9 kB
  • After minification 35.3 kB
  • After compression 31.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Readability.io needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.6 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (69%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Readability. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

readability.io

readability.io

290 ms

readability.io

readability.io

655 ms

css2

css2

57 ms

all.css

all.css

72 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

80 ms

style.css

style.css

129 ms

jquery-3.5.1.slim.min.js

jquery-3.5.1.slim.min.js

41 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

54 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

90 ms

cloudpayments.js

cloudpayments.js

858 ms

checkout.js

checkout.js

848 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

48 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

256 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

129 ms

3_1_FFFFFFFF_EFEFEFFF_0_pageviews

3_1_FFFFFFFF_EFEFEFFF_0_pageviews

664 ms

about.png

about.png

662 ms

watch.js

watch.js

1 ms

Accessibility Review

readability.io accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

readability.io best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

readability.io SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Readability.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Readability.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

readability.io

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Readability. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: